Analisa Risiko Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja Menggunakan Standar AS/NZS 4360:2004 Di Perusahaan Pulp&Paper

Muhamad Bob Anthony(1*),

(1) Program Studi Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Serang Raya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research has the purpose to find out the value of the risk of the potential dangers of work and level of risk of the potential dangers of working and know the potential dangers of dominant work that led to the occurrence of accidents at the company's pulp paper process in & area the production of paper. This research approach by using the method of HIRA (Hazard Identification and Risk just my Assesment) using the standard AS/NZS4360:2004 to calculate values before there is risk control (basic risk) until after control of risk (existing risk). The results of the activities of the production process on the company PT. XYZ is acquired 16 basic risk activity that consists of a category acceptable risk as 6, priority 3 category 2 category, substantial risk (priority 2) as many as 3 risk, priority 1 category 4 category of risk and very high risk as much as 1. After control of the risk (the existing risk) obtained a decrease risk category can be received (acceptable) a total of 10 risk (62.5%), priority 3 as much as 5 risk (31.25%) and substantial category (priority 2) as much as 1 risk (6.25%) While the priority categories 1 and very high risk categories have been lost after a controlling or mitigating risk

Keyword : AS/NZS 4360:2004, basic risk, existing risk

Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk mengetahui nilai risiko potensi bahaya kerja dan level risiko potensi bahaya kerja serta mengetahui potensi bahaya kerja dominan yang menyebabkan terjadinya kecelakaan kerja di perusahaan pulp&paper pada proses di area produksi kertas. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan dengan metode HIRA (Hazard Identification and Risk Assesment) dengan menggunakan standar AS/NZS4360:2004 untuk menghitung nilai-nilai risiko sebelum ada pengendalian (basic risk) sampai setelah dilakukan pengendalian terhadap risiko (existing risk). Hasil penelitian dari kegiatan proses produksi pada perusahaan PT. XYZ ini didapatkan 16 kegiatan basic risk  yang terdiri dari kategori acceptable sebanyak 6 risiko, kategori priority 3 sebanyak 2 risiko, kategori substantial (priority 2) sebanyak 3 risiko, kategori priority 1 sebanyak 4 risiko dan kategori very high sebanyak 1 risiko. Setelah dilakukan pengendalian terhadap risiko (existing risk) didapatkan penurunan resiko yaitu kategori dapat di terima (acceptable) sebanyak 10 risiko (62,5%), priority 3 sebanyak 5 risiko (31,25%) dan kategori substantial (priority 2) sebanyak 1 risiko (6,25%) sedangkan kategori priority 1 dan kategori very high risk  telah hilang setelah dilakukan pengendalian atau mitigasi resiko.

 

Kata Kunci: AS/NZS 4360:2004, basic risk, existing risk


Full Text:

PDF

References


L. Jacxsens, M. Uyttendaele, and B. De Meulenaer, “Challenges in Risk Assessment: Quantitative Risk Assessment,” Procedia Food Sci., vol. 6, no. Icsusl 2015, pp. 23–30, 2016.

E. Jamilah, Y. H. Yadi, and A. Umyati, “Identifikasi Potensi Bahaya Dengan Metode Hazard And Operability Study ( HAZOP ) Di Area Boiler PT . XYZ,” J. Tek. Ind. Univ. Ageng Tirtayas, 2013.

Psychologymania, “Pengertian Kesehatan Kerja,” www.psychologymania.com, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.psychologymania.com/2012/09/pengertian-kesehatan-kerja.html. [Accessed: 29-Nov-2019].

N. H. Hamidah, P. Deoranto, and R. Astuti, “ANALISIS PRODUKTIVITAS MENGGUNAKAN METODE OBJECTIVE MATRIX (OMAX): STUDI KASUS PADA BAGIAN PRODUKSI SARI ROTI PT NIPPON INDOSARI CORPINDO, TBK PASURUAN Productivity Analysis Using Objective Matrix (OMAX) Method: Case Study On The Production Departement Of,” J. Teknol. Pertan. Anal. Produkt., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 215–222, 2013.

Prodiaohi, “Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja,” prodiaohi.co.id, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://prodiaohi.co.id/kesehatan-dan-keselamatan-kerja. [Accessed: 29-Nov-2019].

D. Misdarpon and M. Fatori, “Keselamatan Kerja dan Kesehatan Lingkungan,” Direktorat Jendral Manaj. Pendidik. Dasar dan Menengah Kementrian Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 1, pp. 1–107, 2013.

S. Rahayuningsih and J. A. Pradana, “Identifikasi Penerapan Dan Pemahaman Kesehatan Dan Keselamatan Kerja Dengan Metode Hazard And Operability Study (Hazop) Pada UMKM Eka Jaya,” JATI UNIK J. Ilm. Tek. dan Manaj. Ind., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 20, 2019.

D. Retnowati, “Analisa Risiko K3 Dengan Pendekatan Hazard and Operability Study (Hazop),” Tek. Eng. Sains J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2017.

S. O. D. Ningsih and S. W. Hati, “Analisis Resiko Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Dengan Menggunakan Metode Hazard And Operability Study (HAZOP) Pada Bagian Hydrotest Manual Di PT. Cladtek Bi Metal Manufacturing,” J. Appl. Bus. Adm., vol. 3 No.1, pp. 29–39, 2019.

P. K. Markkanen, Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja di Indonesia. Jakarta : Internasional Labour Organisation Sub Regional South-East Asia and The Pacific Manila Philippines, 2004.

M. Soyster, B. T. Ristau, E. D. Girard, Y. Liang, P. Hegde, and B. A. Harnisch, “An unlikely connection: Rare case of colo-urachal fistula, surgical management, and review of the literature,” Urol. Case Reports, vol. 18, pp. 9–10, 2018.

Sugiyono, “Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods),” Bandung Alf., 2010.

H. Hasanah, “TEKNIK-TEKNIK OBSERVASI (Sebuah Alternatif Metode Pengumpulan Data Kualitatif Ilmu-ilmu Sosial),” At-Taqaddum, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 21, 2017.

A. Y. Ambarani and A. R. Tualeka, “Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (Hira) Pada Proses Fabrikasi Plate Tanki 42-T-501a Pt Pertamina (Persero) Ru Vi Balongan,” Indones. J. Occup. Saf. Heal., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 192, 2017.

A. 4360:2004, “Perbandingan Standar Manajemen Risiko Australia / New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 4360:2004 dengan COSO Enterprise Risk Management 2004.” Standar Manajemen Risiko Australia/ New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 4360:2004, Australia, pp. 1–5, 2004.

AustralianStandard, “Australian Standard / New Zaeland Standard Risk Management 4360:2004.” Sydney and Wellington, New Zealand, p. 1, 2004.

D. Macdonald, Practical Hazops, Trips and Alarms, 1st ed. Newnes, 2004.

Vishwas H SG D Gidwani, “Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment in Metro Railway Line Construction Project at Hyderabad,” Int. J. Eng. Res., vol. V6, no. 08, pp. 243–249, 2017.

P. Pradhan, “A HIRARC MODEL FOR SAFETY AND RISK AT I nternational J ournal of E ngineering R esearches and M anagement S tudies,” IJERMS, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 23–34, 2016.

H. Luthfi,Achmad dan Irawan, “Analisis Risiko Rantai Pasok Dengan Model House Of Risk (HOR),” Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia. 2012.

Nurlela and H. Suprapto, “Identifikasi dan Analisis Manajemen Risiko Pada Proyek Pembangunan Infrastruktur Bangunan Gedung Bertingkat,” J. Ilm. Desain dan Konstr., 2014.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30737/jatiunik.v2i2.332

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 490 times
PDF - 223 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 JATI UNIK : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik dan Manajemen Industri



Creative Commons License
JATI UNIK is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.