Analisis Evaluasi Kinerja Vendor Berdasarkan Penetapan Kriteria Vendor Performance Indicator (VPI) Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Pada PT. XYZ

Nadya Uci Pramita(1*), Adhitomo Wirawan(2),

(1) Politeknik Negeri Batam
(2) Politeknik Negeri Batam
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to analyze the process of performance evaluation of vendors especially in the vendor that provides a raw material for pressure vessel plate made of carbon steel. As for the evaluation process undertaken by PT. XYZ through performance indicators (KPI) where an evaluation that applied a focus on quality and delivery. In this study, researchers used the designation criteria vendor performance indicator (VPI) where the criteria used consist of quality, cost, delivery, flexibility and responsiveness (QCDFR). The methods used in the analysis process that is Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Data collecting directionally by questionnaire method among 3 respondents on the procurement department that know the performance of the vendors over the years. The result showed that PT. RE has the best performance among the four vendors, as known PT.SS, PT. ST, PT. CH and PT. UN within value 0.540; The vendor with lowest performance owned by PT.CH within value 0.034.

Keyword : Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), vendor performance indicator (vpi), plate pressure vessel, vendor performance evaluation

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis proses evaluasi kinerja vendor khususnya pada vendor yang mensupplai bahan baku plate pressure vessel berbahan carbon steel. Adapun proses evaluasi yang dilakukan oleh PT. XYZ melalui key performance indicator (KPI) dimana evaluasi yang diterapkan hanya berfokus pada quality dan delivery. Dalam studi ini, peneliti menggunakan penetapan kriteria Vendor Performance Indicator (VPI) dimana kriteria yang digunakan yaitu quality, cost, delivery, flexibility dan responsiveness (QCDFR). Metode yang digunakan dalam proses analisis yaitu Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Pengambilan data menggunakan kuisioner terhadap 3 informan pada departemen procurement yang dianggap mengetahui kinerja vendor selama ini. Adapun hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PT. RE memiliki kinerja yang terbaik diantara keempat vendor yaitu PT. SS, PT. ST, PT. CH serta PT. UN dengan nilai bobot sebesar 0.540 sedangkan vendor dengan kinerja terendah dimiliki oleh PT. CH dengan nilai bobot sebesar 0.034.

Kata kunci : Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), vendor performance indicator (VPI), plate pressure vessel, evaluasi kinerja vendor.


Full Text:

PDF

References


M. A. Wibowo and M. N. Sholeh, “The analysis of supply chain performance measurement at construction project,” Procedia Eng., vol. 125, pp. 25–31, 2015.

Okfalisa, S. Anugrah, W. Anggraini, M. Absor, S. S. M. Fauzi, and Saktioto, “Integrated analytical hierarchy process and objective matrix in balanced scorecard dashboard model for performance measurement,” Telkomnika (Telecommunication Comput. Electron. Control., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2703–2711, 2018.

R. Rochmoeljati, “Pengukuran Kinerja Supplier Berdasarkan Vendor Performance Indicator Dengan Metode Quality Cost Delivery Flexibility Responsiveness ( Studi Kasus : Pt Boma Bisma Indra Surabaya ),” J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 1, no. 2, 2012.

F. De Felice, M. H. Deldoost, M. Faizollahi, and A. Petrillo, “Performance measurement model for the supplier selection based on AHP,” Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag., vol. 7, pp. 1–13, 2015.

L. Kristiyanti and A. Sugiharto, “Analytical Hierarchy Process,” Indomedia Pustaka, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 39–47, 2007.

Y. Jeong, I. Chae, I. Yang, H. Kim, and H. Lee, “Analysis of Relative Importance of Key Performance Indicators for Center for Child-Care Foodservice Management through Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),” vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 154–164, 2013.

K. M. A. S. Al-Harbi, “Application of the AHP in project management,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 19–27, 2001.

A. I. Nurani, A. T. Pramudyaningrum, S. R. Fadhila, S. Sangadji, and W. Hartono, “Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuzzy AHP, and TOPSIS for Determining Bridge Maintenance Priority Scale in Banjarsari, Surakarta,” Int. J. Sci. Appl. Sci. Conf. Ser., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 60, 2017.

D. P. Alam Syah, “Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process: Sistem Rekomender Database Software,” J. Inform., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 59–73, 2014.

I. Agusta, “Teknik Pengumpulan dan Analisis Data Kualitatif,” J. Stud. Komun. dan Media, vol. 02, no. 1998, pp. 1–11, 2014.

Ali Maksum, “Data, Teknik Pengumpulan Data dan Instrumen Penelitian,” J. Cakrawala Kependidikan, no. agustus, p. 107, 2012.

P. D. Sugiyono, metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif,dan R&D. 2016.

M. P. Dr. Whidmurni, “Penelitian Kuantitatif,” Pemaparan Metod. Kuantitatif, 2017.

A. A. Karl, J. Micheluzzi, L. R. Leite, and C. R. Pereira, “Supply chain resilience and key performance indicators: A systematic literature review,” Producao, vol. 28, 2018.

A. D. Prayitno and P. A. Wibowo, “Analisis Finansial Pertanian Garam dan Pengguna Geoisolator di Kecamatan Batangan dan Juwana,” Econ. Dev. Anal. Journa, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 446–455, 2017.

O. Siburian, “ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI EKSPOR KARET ALAM INDONESIA KE SINGAPURA TAHUN 1980-2010,” Econ. Dev. Anal. J., vol. 1, no. 2, 2012.

R. Octaviani, “Application of AHP Method for selecting the best strategy to reduce environmental demage caused by non metallic mining Case study in Gunungkidul Regency, Yogakarta, Indonesia,” Int. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 2326–3113, 2013.

A. Khaira and R. K. Dwivedi, “A State of the Art Review of Analytical Hierarchy Process,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 5, no. 2, Part 1, pp. 4029–4035, 2018.

S. Moeller, M. Fassnacht, S. Klose, S. Moeller, and S. Klose, “A Framework for Supplier Relationship Management ( SRM ) A Framework for Supplier Relationship Management ( SRM ),” vol. 0628, no. December, pp. 68–95, 2008.

E. Supriharyanti, “Supplier Relationship Management Dalam Pendekatan Contigency Dan Best Practice,” Kinerja J. Bus. Econ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 67–80, 2005.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30737/jatiunik.v2i2.344

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 538 times
PDF - 375 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 JATI UNIK : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik dan Manajemen Industri



Creative Commons License
JATI UNIK is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.