Main Article Content

Abstract

Pelatihan manajamen pembelajaran dengan critical thinking queston dimaksudkan
untuk meningkatkan kemampuan para guru SD Muhammadiyah 3 Depok, Jawa
Barat agar mampu malaksananakan praktik pembelajaran yang dapat membangun
kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Metode yang dilakukan dalam pelatihan ini
dibagi empat tahap, yaitu pengondisian, eksplorasi, elaborasi, dan konfirmasi.
pemodelan tahap. Dalam kegiatan pelatihan ini para guru diberikan pemahaman
secara teoretis tentang critical thinking queston, diberikan model pembelajaran
yang menerapkan critical thinking queston, dan kemuadian secara bergantian
mempraktikkan pembelajaran teknik critical thinking queston. Setelah megikuti
pelatihan terdapat banyak perubahan positif dalam praktik pembelajaran yang
dilakukan oleh para guru di SD Muhammadiyah 3 Depok, Jawa Barat.
Pembelajaran tidak lagi berpusat kepada guru, melainkan berpusat kepada siswa
yang lebih banyak memberikan kesempatan kepada siswa untuk mengajukan
pertannyaan serta berpikir kritis ketika dihadapkan pada suatu fenomena.
Pertanyaan-pertanyaan evaluasi yang dikembangkan guru pun lebih bervariasi,
tidak hanya mengukur aspek kognitif tingkat rendah saja, tetapi juga mengukur
berbagai ranah kognitif yang lebih tinggi lagi serta berbagai aspek kompetensi
yang lebih komprehensif.

Article Details

How to Cite
PELATIHAN PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN STRTAEGI CRITICAL THINKING QUESTION. (2018). Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat , 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30737/jaim.v2i1.237

How to Cite

PELATIHAN PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN STRTAEGI CRITICAL THINKING QUESTION. (2018). Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat , 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30737/jaim.v2i1.237

References

  1. Acat, B., & Dönmez, I. (2009). To compare student centred education and teacher centred education in primary science and technology lesson in terms of learning environments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1 (1), 1805–1809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.320
  2. Bensley, D. A., Rainey, C., Murtagh, M. P., Flinn, J. A., Maschiocchi, C., Bernhardt, P. C., & Kuehne, S. (2016). Closing the assessment loop on critical thinking: The challenges of multidimensional testing and low testtaking motivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.06.006
  3. Bosman, R. J., Roorda, D. L., van der Veen, I., & Koomen, H. M. Y.
  4. (2018). Teacher-student relationship quality from kindergarten to sixth grade and students’ school adjustment: A person-centered approach. Journal of School Psychology, 68 (December 2017), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.03.006
  5. Cargas, S., Williams, S., & Rosenberg, M. (2017). An approach to teaching critical thinking across disciplines using performance tasks with a common rubric. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 24–37.
  6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.05.005
  7. Carter, A. G., Creedy, D. K., & Sidebotham, M. (2017a). Critical thinking evaluation in reflective writing: Development and testing of Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Reflection). Midwifery,54 (May), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.08.003
  8. Carter, A. G., Creedy, D. K., & Sidebotham, M. (2017b). Critical thinking skills in midwifery practice: Development of a self-assessment tool for students. Midwifery, 50 (April), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.010
  9. Chen, L. (2017). Understanding critical thinking in Chinese sociocultural contexts: A case study in a Chinese college. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.015
  10. Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
  11. Fun, C. S., & Maskat, N. (2010). Teacher-Centered Mind Mapping vs Student-Centered Mind Mapping in the teaching of accounting at Pre-U level- An action research. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7 (C), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.034
  12. Heijltjes, A., van Gog, T., Leppink, J., & Paas, F.(2014). Improving critical thinking: Effects of dispositions and instructions oneconomics students reasoning skills. Learning and Instruction, 29, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.003
  13. Kim, A. K., & Davies, J. (2014). A teacher’s perspective on student centred learning: Towards the development of best practice in an undergraduate tourism course. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 14 (1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2013.12.001
  14. Nielsen, T., & Kreiner, S. (2017). Course evaluation for the purpose of development: What can learning styles contribute? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.10.004
  15. Potter, T. C. S., Bryce, N. V., & Hartley, C. A. (2017). Cognitive components underpinning the development of model-based learning. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 272–280.
  16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.10.005
  17. Sojitra, R. B., Lerner, I., Petok, J. R., & Gluck, M. A. (2018). Age affects reinforcement learning through dopamine-based learning imbalance and high decision noise—not through Parkinsonian mechanisms. Neurobiology of Aging, 68, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.04.006
  18. Stupple, E. J. N., Maratos, F. A., Elander, J., Hunt, T. E., Cheung, K. Y. F., & Aubeeluck, A. V. (2017). Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (CriTT): A measure of student attitudes and beliefs about critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 91–100.
  19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.007
  20. Sukhai, M. A., & Mohler, C. E. (2017). Simulation learning. Creating a Culture of Accessibility in the Sciences, 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12804037-9.00022-X