Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mendasari Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30737/ekonika.v7i2.2826Keywords:
Kecurangan Akademik, Fraud Pentagon, Self-esteemAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menelusuri pengaruh fraud pentagon dan self-esteem pada perilaku kecurangan akademik. Terdapat beberapa faktor yang mendorong seseorang untuk melakukan tindak kecurangan. Berdasarkan Crowe’s Fraud Pentagon Model, terdapat lima elemen yang mendorong seseorang melakukan kecurangan yang terdiri dari elemen tekanan, peluang, rasionalisasi, kompetensi, dan arogansi. Sifat kepribadian diyakini mampu mempengaruhi perilaku seseorang salah satunya self-esteem. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menyebarkan kuesioner kepada responden yaitu mahasiswa Program Studi Manajemen di Universitas Warmadewa dan Universitas Mahasaraswati. Hasil uji instrumen menyatakan bahwa instrumen penelitian telah valid dan reliabel. Uji asumsi klasik menunjukan bahwa penelitian ini telah memenuhi asas normalitas, terbebas dari heteroskedastisitas dan multikolinearitas. Hipotesis diuji dengan analisis regresi linear berganda. Hasil uji hipotesis menunjukan bahwa peluang, rasionalisasi, dan kompetensi berpengaruh positif dan signifikan pada perilaku kecurangan akademik. Hasil berikutnya menunjukan bahwa self-esteem berpengaruh negative dan signifikan pada perilaku kecurangan akademik. Berbanding terbalik dengan tekanan dan arogansi yang justru berpengaruh tidak signifikan pada perilaku kecurangan akademik.
Downloads
References
Arfiana, M., & Sholikhah, N. (2021). Fraud Diamond Dan Literasi Ekonomi Sebagai Determinan Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(4), 1623–1637. https://www.edukatif.org/index.php/edukatif/article/view/658
Christiana, A., Kristiani, A., & Pangestu, S. (2021). ONLINE LEARNING DISHONESTY AT THE BEGINNING OF THE COVID-19. 19(1), 66–83.
Cushman, F. (2019). Rationalization is rational. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19001730
Damayanti, N. N. S. R. (2019). The Effect of Work Engagement and Self-Efficacy on Job Burnout of Credit Analyst. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management, 4(3), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v4i3.689
Hendricks, B. (2004). Academic Dishonesty : A Study in the Magnitude of and Justifications for Academic Dishonesty Among College Undergraduate and Graduate Students. In Jurnal of College Student Development (Vol. 5, Issue 3).
Marks, T. J. (2014). Playing Offense in a High-Risk Environment (Issue November).
Muhsin, Kardoyo, & Nurkhin, A. (2018). What Determinants of Academic Fraud Behavior? From Fraud Triangle to Fraud Pentagon Perspective. KnE Social Sciences, 3(10), 154. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3126
Purnamasari, D., & Irianto, G. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Dimensi fraud Triangle terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Pada Saat Ujian dan Metode Pencegahannya. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB Universitas Brawijaya, 2(2), 1–25.
Rangkuti, A. A. (2011). Academic Cheating Behaviour of Accounting Students : A Case Study in Jakarta State University. Proceedings 5th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity, 105–109. https://docplayer.net/27121639-Academic-cheating-behaviour-of-accounting-students-a-case-study-in-jakarta-state-university.html
Refnadi, R. (2018). Konsep self-esteem serta implikasinya pada siswa. Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.29210/120182133
Sagoro, E. M. (2013). Pensinergian Mahasiswa, Dosen, Dan Lembaga Dalam Pencegahan Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 11(2), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v11i2.1691
Sharma, S. (2006). Emotional stability of visually disabled in relation to their study habits. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 32(1), 30–32.
Shon, P. C. H. (2006). How College Students Cheat On In-Class Examinations: Creativity, Strain, and Techniques of Innovation. Plagiary: Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 1(10), 1–20. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:How+College+Students+Cheat+On+In-Class+Examinations:+Creativity,+Strain,+and+Techniques+of+Innovation#0
Silverman, S. B., Johnson, R. E., Mcconnell, N., & Carr, A. (2012). Arrogance : A Formula for Leadership Failure. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 50(1), 21–28.
Srisayekti, W., & Setiady, D. A. (2015). Harga-diri (Self-esteem) Terancam dan Perilaku Menghindar. Jurnal Psikologi, 42(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.7169
Tanesini, A. (2018). Arrogance, anger and debate. Symposion, 5(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.5840/symposion20185217
Taufiq, A. (2018). Paradigma Baru Pendidikan Tinggi dan Makna Kuliah Bagi Mahasiswa. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
Uher, J. (2017). Open Peer Commentary and Authors’ Response. European Journal of Personality, 31(5), 529–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2128
Widyastuti Y, Rahmawati A, Purnamaningrum YE. 2009. Kesehatan Reproduksi. Yogyakarta : Fitramaya
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The FWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. (2004) ‘The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud: Certified Public Accountant’, The CPA Journal, 74(12), pp. 38–42. doi: DOI:raud Diamond : Considering the Four ElemWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.
Yulianto, A., Dahriyanto, L. F., Wijayanti, R., & Adininggar, P. (2020). The Effect of Fraud Pentagon and Academic Procrastination Dimensions Towards Academic Dishonesty of Students of Social Science in Senior High School of Semarang. 464(Psshers 2019), 1158–1169. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200824.251
Yusof, Mohamed Khair, Ahmad Simon, J. (2013). The Macrotheme Review. A Multidisciplinary Journal of Global Macro Trends, 2(4), 144–160.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 I Gde Agung Wira Pertama, I Putu Budi Anggiriawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ekonika: Jurnal Ekonomi Universitas Kadiri agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
