Not Just Outcomes: Why the Process Experience Determines Public Satisfaction at Public Service Malls
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30737/ekonika.v11i2.7653Keywords:
Process quality, Outcome quality, Perceived public value, Citizen satisfaction, Public Service MallAbstract
The physical availability of Public Service Malls (MPP) does not automatically guarantee public satisfaction, making it important to understand the actual factors that shape it. This study aims to examine the influence of public service quality, consisting of process quality and outcome quality, on public satisfaction through the mediation of perceived public value, while also testing the direct paths of both dimensions. The research adopts a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional survey design involving 202 users of the MPP Among Warga Kota Batu services, selected via purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results show that both process quality and outcome quality have a positive effect on perceived public value, and perceived public value is the strongest predictor of public satisfaction. Process quality has a direct effect on satisfaction, whereas outcome quality does not. The main finding lies in the asymmetry of the mediation role: perceived public value partially mediates process quality, but fully mediates outcome quality. This result confirms that the mediating role of perceived public value is not uniform but depends on the quality dimension in question. This study contributes to the public value literature by validating an integrative model that combines mediation and direct paths, and also provides practical guidance for MPP managers to prioritize the quality of the service process experience.
Downloads
References
A’aqoulah, A., Kuyini, A. B., & Albalas, S. (2022). Exploring the gap between patients’ expectations and perceptions of healthcare service quality. Patient Preference and Adherence, 16, 1295–1305. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S360852
Ariski, D. Y. A., Yuningsih, T., & Herawati, A. R. (2023). Implementation of Public Service Malls (MPP) in improving One Stop Integrated Services (PTSP) in Rembang Regency. Jurnal Public Policy, 9(4), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v9i4.7998
Bhinekawati, R. (2016). Government Initiatives to Empower Small and Medium Enterprise: Comparing One Stop Shop for Licensing in Indonesia and Australia. Journal of ASEAN Studies, 4(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v4i1.832
Birokrasi, K. P. A. N. dan R. (2025). Peresmian Mal Pelayanan Publik Triwulan III 2025. https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-foto/peresmian-mal-pelayanan-publik-triwulan-iii-2025
Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2021). Service design and citizen satisfaction with e-government services: A multidimensional perspective. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 874–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13308
Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00028-2
de Oña, J. (2021). Service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions towards public transport from the point of view of private vehicle users. Transportation, 49, 237–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10175-7
Engdaw, B. D. (2020). The impact of quality public service delivery on customer satisfaction in Bahir Dar City Administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(7), 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1644520
Fredriksson, M. (2020). One stop shops for public services: Evidence from citizen service centers in Brazil. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(4), 1133–1165. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22255
Ge, Y., Yuan, Q., Wang, Y., & Park, K. (2021). The Structural Relationship among Perceived Service Quality, Perceived Value, and Customer Satisfaction: Focused on Starbucks Reserve Coffee Shops in Shanghai, China. Sustainability, 13(15), 8633. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158633
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25 (9th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Grönroos, C. (1984). A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004784
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).
Hasan, I. R., Agustang, A., Kahar, F., & Tahir, H. (2019). “Super Service Delivery”: an advanced conceptual model of one-stop service for wide administrative region. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(1), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.17
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hertzog, M. A. (2008). Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20247
Indonesia, O. R. (2024). Laporan tahunan Ombudsman Republik Indonesia tahun 2023: Perkuat kerja sama perluas pengawasan pelayanan publik. Ombudsman RI.
JatimTIMES. (2025). Kunjungan Mal Pelayanan Publik Among Warga tembus 47 ribu, IKM diklaim meningkat. https://jatimtimes.com/baca/346883/20251003/043500/kunjungan-mal-pelayanan-publik-among-warga-tembus-47-ribu-ikm-diklaim-meningkat
Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355692
Kasiri, L. A., Cheng, K. T. G., Sambasivan, M., & Sidin, S. M. (2017). Integration of standardization and customization: Impact on service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 35, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.11.007
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum Sample Size Estimation in PLS-SEM: The Inverse Square Root and Gamma-Exponential Methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
Kowalik, K., & Klimecka-Tatar, D. (2018). The process approach to service quality management. Production Engineering Archives, 18, 31–34. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2018.18.05
Kurti, S., & Kina, K. (2024). Citizen satisfaction’s determinants with the integrated public services quality provided by One-Stop-Shop: A case from a Western Balkan country. Public Policy and Administration, 23(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.23.3.31953
Lee, H., Lee, Y., & Yoo, D. (2000). The determinants of perceived service quality and its relationship with satisfaction. Journal of Services Marketing, 14(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040010327220
Metwally, E., & Samir, E. (2024). Assessing citizen satisfaction indicators for urban public services to enhance quality of life in Sharm el-Sheikh. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(8), 102841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102841
Moore, M. H., & Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Hm9uKVj0qDYC
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Ochoa Rico, M. S., Vergara-Romero, A., Subia, J. F., & del Río, J. A. (2022). Study of citizen satisfaction and loyalty in the urban area of Guayaquil: Perspective of the quality of public services applying structural equations. PLoS ONE, 17(2), e0262564. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262564
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499
Oliver, R. L. (1981). Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Processes in Retail Settings. Journal of Retailing, 57(3), 25–48.
Pakurár, M., Haddad, H., Nagy, J., Popp, J., & Oláh, J. (2019). The service quality dimensions that affect customer satisfaction in the Jordanian banking sector. Sustainability, 11(4), 1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041113
Pan, J.-Y., & Ha, H.-Y. (2021). Service quality and satisfaction in the context of varying levels of restaurant image and customer orientation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(17), 9694. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179694
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251430
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Pham, L., & Limbu, Y. B. (2023). E-government service quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: Evidence from a newly emerging country. Journal of Public Policy, 43(4), 812–833. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X23000296
Rhee, S.-K., & Rha, J.-Y. (2009). Public service quality and customer satisfaction: Exploring the attributes of service quality in the public sector. The Service Industries Journal, 29(11), 1491–1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060903026286
Scupola, A., & Mergel, I. (2022). Co-production in digital transformation of public administration and public value creation: The case of Denmark. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101650
Siyum, B. A. (2024). Service quality gap in Ethiopia: Expected and perceived services in the public sector. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2359269. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2359269
Sunarya, A., Milwan, M., Sari, J. A., & Yunus, N. M. (2025). Integrated service delivery analysis of public service malls in Pemalang Regency. Jurnal Public Policy, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v11i4.11598
Suranto, S., Darumurti, A., Hartomi, D., Padma, A., & Habibullah, A. (2021). Jurnal Public Policy Potret Kebijakan Inovasi Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia Tahun 2020. Jurnal Public Policy, 7. https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v7i2.4095
Tian, F., Zhou, J., & Liu, F. (2025). Construction of the national fitness public service satisfaction model in China based on American Customer Satisfaction Index. PLoS ONE, 20(1), e0317551. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317551
Uzir, M. U. H., Al Halbusi, H., Thurasamy, R., Hock, R. L. T., Aljaberi, M. A., Hasan, N., & Hamid, M. A. (2021). The effects of service quality, perceived value and trust in home delivery service personnel on customer satisfaction: Evidence from a developing country. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102721
Uzir, M. U. H., Jerin, I., Al Halbusi, H., Hamid, A. B. A., & Latiff, A. S. A. (2020). Does quality stimulate customer satisfaction where perceived value mediates and the usage of social media moderates? Heliyon, 6(12), e05557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05557
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251929
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bimara Aryanoraga, Muhammad Rizki

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Ekonika: Jurnal Ekonomi Universitas Kadiri agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).










