Evaluating Differences in Foundation Depth Planning and Implementation for Building Structure Safety

Authors

  • Sheila Ananda Putri Pertiwi Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kadiri University, Kediri, Indonesia
  • Agata Iwan Candra Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kadiri University, Kediri, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7657-6810
  • Rama Putra Nugraha Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kadiri University, Kediri, Indonesia
  • Tiara Sherlyta Sari Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kadiri University, Kediri, Indonesia
  • Wiwit Mely Yanti Jannah Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kadiri University, Kediri, Indonesia
  • M. Faisol Firmansyah Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kadiri University, Kediri, Indonesia
  • Mohammad Agus Fajar Wibowo Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kadiri University, Kediri, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30737/ukarst.v7i2.4955

Keywords:

Bearing Capacity, Cone Penetration Test, CPT Distance, Negative Skin Friction, Pile

Abstract

Kediri has been named the Most Sustainable City. To support this, Kadiri University also contributed by building lecture buildings. In its implementation, there is a difference in the depth of the foundation from the initial plan. This causes the need for evaluation to ensure the safety of the building structure. This research aims to identify (Cone Penetration Test) CPT distances, depth differences, negative skin friction, settlement, and empirical bearing capacity calculations on the safety of building structures on sandy soil. The direct observation method was used to obtain data. The analysis includes a comparison of depth, negative skin friction values, settlement, and bearing capacity. The research results show that the average CPT distance is 18.22 m, which can result in inaccurate CPT data because differences in soil structure can occur. A depth difference of 22% from the plan can be considered safe for the structure. This is validated by a field settlement of 2 mm lower than the maximum settlement limit and a Negative skin friction value of 0, indicating no additional settlement. These parameters indicate that the structure is safe. The modified Meyerhoff and Trofimankove methods are suitable for planning foundations with sandy soil because they can meet the load received. This research can add empirical evidence in evaluating structural safety for different depths of foundation planning and implementation in sandy soil-based projects, as well as reducing the potential risk of structural failure in the long term.

References

S. Noble, M. Mende, D. Grewal, and A. Parasuraman, “The Fifth Industrial Revolution: How Harmonious Human–Machine Collaboration is Triggering a Retail and Service [R]evolution,” J. Retail., vol. 98, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2022.04.003.

K. K. B. P. R.I., “Laporan Capaian Kinerja Triwulan III Tahun 2022 Asisten Deputi Pengembangan Industri Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian,” p. 39, 2022.

S. F. A. Shah et al., “The Role of Machine Learning and the Internet of Things in Smart Buildings for Energy Efficiency,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 15, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12157882.

S. A. Chun, D. Kim, J. S. Cho, M. Chuang, S. Shin, and D. Jun, “Framework for smart city model composition: Choice of component design models and risks,” Int. J. E-Planning Res., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 50–69, 2021, doi: 10.4018/IJEPR.20210701.oa4.

M. O. Oyewole, F. M. Araloyin, and P. T. Oyewole, “Residents’ Awareness and Aspiration for Smart Building Features: The Case of Okota, Lagos, Nigeria,” Niger. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 30–40, 2019, doi: 10.36263/nijest.2019.01.0098.

D. Kartikasari and D. Sanhadi, “Studi Evaluasi Pondasi Tiang Pancang (Spun Pile) Dengan Pondasi Tiang Bor (Bored Pile) Pada Gedung Kantor Pemerintah Kabupaten Lamongan,” UKaRsT, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 31, 2019, doi: 10.30737/ukarst.v3i2.602.

A. Zhanabayeva, S. Abdialim, A. Satyanaga, J. Kim, and S. W. Moon, “Comparative analysis of international codes of practice for pile foundation design considering negative skin friction effect,” Int. J. Geo-Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40703-022-00176-5.

P. J. Vardon and J. Peuchen, “CPT correlations for thermal properties of soils,” Acta Geotech., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 635–646, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11440-020-01027-2.

H. Qiu, Y. Zhou, and M. Ayasrah, “Impact Study of Deep Foundations Construction of Inclined and Straight Combined Support Piles on Adjacent Pile Foundations,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13031810.

Y. J. Jeong, M. S. Park, S. H. Song, and J. Kim, “Numerical evaluation of structural safety for aged onshorewind foundation to extend service life,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 13, 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10134561.

O. Shawky, A. I. Altahrany, and M. Elmeligy, “Study of Lateral Load Influence on Behaviour of Negative Skin Friction on Circular and Square Piles,” Civ. Eng. J., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 2125–2153, 2022, doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-10-08.

F. Yin, Y. Hao, T. Xiao, Y. Shao, and M. Yuan, “The Prediction of Pile Foundation Buried Depth Based on BP Neural Network Optimized by Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization,” Adv. Civ. Eng., vol. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/2015408.

L. I. Kevan, K. M. Rollins, R. A. Coffman, and E. Ishimwe, “Full-scale blast liquefaction testing in arkansas usa to evaluate pile downdrag and neutral plane concepts,” Earthq. Geotech. Eng. Prot. Dev. Environ. Constr. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Earthq. Geotech. Eng. 2019, pp. 648–655, 2019.

D. Geng, C. Tan, N. Wang, and Y. Jiang, “Influence of Shield Tunnel and Train Load on Existing Bridge Piles,” 2020.

L. Li and Y. Deng, “Analysis of Settlement of Group Pile Foundation in Linear Viscoelastic Soil,” Adv. Civ. Eng., vol. 2023, 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/3207304.

X. Gu, F. Chen, W. Zhang, Q. Wang, and H. Liu, “Numerical investigation of pile responses induced by adjacent tunnel excavation in spatially variable clays,” Undergr. Sp., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 911–927, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.undsp.2021.09.003.

J. W. Yun and J. T. Han, “Evaluation of the dynamic behavior of pile groups considering the kinematic force of the slope using centrifuge model tests,” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., vol. 173, no. October 2022, p. 108106, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108106.

H. Van Cao and T. A. Nguyen, “Verification and Validation of the Pile Design Method With Consideration of Down Drag,” Int. J. GEOMATE, vol. 23, no. 96, pp. 145–152, 2022, doi: 10.21660/2022.96.3433.

F. Jawad, E. Al-Taie, and M. Fattah, “Static interaction in soil -pile -cap system using three-dimensional analysis,” Period. Eng. Nat. Sci., vol. 8, pp. 1049–1059, Jun. 2020.

Y. Wu, Y. Ren, J. Liu, and L. Ma, “Analysis of Negative Skin Friction on a Single Pile Based on the Effective Stress Method and the Finite Element Method,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 9, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12094125.

A. M. Dzagov, “Assessment of Negative Skin Friction in Bored Cast-In-Situ Piles According to Cone Penetration Test Data in Subsiding Soils,” Soil Mech. Found. Eng., vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 439–444, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11204-022-09764-0.

L. Tianyun, Y. Changyi, and Z. Nan, “Research on Influence of Deep Foundation Pit Excavation and Dewatering on Pile Foundation of Railway Bridge,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 283, p. 1019, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202128301019.

Y. Dey and S. Das, “Settlement Analysis of Pile Foundation Using Plaxis 3D,” Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 211–216, 2022, doi: 10.33564/ijeast.2022.v07i01.034.

M. Cao and A. Zhou, “Fictitious pile method for fixed-head pile groups subjected to horizontal loading,” Soils Found., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 63–76, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2020.01.005.

L. Hazzar, M. N. Hussien, and M. Karray, “Influence of vertical loads on lateral response of pile foundations in sands and clays,” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 291–304, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.09.002.

A. K. Somantri and P. J. S. Tarigan, “Comparison of bearing capacity pile foundation base on pile dynamic analyzer test and conventional analysis (Case on foundation bridge in Cikampek),” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 622, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/622/1/012031.

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2023-11-29

How to Cite

Pertiwi, S. A. P., Candra, A. I., Nugraha, R. P., Sari, T. S., Jannah, W. M. Y., Firmansyah, M. F., & Wibowo, M. A. F. (2023). Evaluating Differences in Foundation Depth Planning and Implementation for Building Structure Safety. UKaRsT, 7(2), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.30737/ukarst.v7i2.4955

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): NOVEMBER

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Sheila Ananda Putri Pertiwi, Agata Iwan Candra, Rama Putra Nugraha, Tiara Sherlyta Sari, Wiwit Mely Yanti Jannah, M. Faisol Firmansyah, Mohammad Agus Fajar Wibowo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

(1) The copyright of published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscript. Therefore, the author needs to confirm that the copyright has been managed by the publisher with the Publication Right Form which must be attached when submitting the article.

(2) Publisher of U Karst is Kadiri University.

(3) The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY SA): This license allows to Share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially.