Flood Risk Analysis for the Construction of the Patimban Port Access Toll Road

Authors

  • Agung Abdullah Dwi Noviantoro Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Langlangbuana University, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Fauzia Mulyawati Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Langlangbuana University, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Rully Savitri Nurvita Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Langlangbuana University, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30737/ukarst.v8i2.6192

Keywords:

Flood Modelling, Flood Risk Analysis, Hydrology Analysis, Soil Conversation Service Method, Surface Water Modelling System (SMS)

Abstract

In recent decades, the risk of flooding in the Cipunagara River area has increased due to global climate change causing more extreme rainfall patterns. The planned construction of the Patimban Port Access Toll Road has a strategic role in supporting national logistics connectivity. However, the geographical location of the planned toll road in the lowlands near the Cipunagara River poses a significant risk to the sustainability of the infrastructure. This study aims to analyze the risk of flooding in the Cipunagara River and its impact on the design of the toll road. Hydrological analysis was carried out using rainfall data from eight observation stations for the period 2012–2021. Analysis of frequency distribution, rainfall intensity and the Soil Conservation Services (SCS) Unit Hydrograph method was carried out to calculate peak flood discharge. Modeling was carried out using Surface Water Modeling System (SMS) software. The results of the study indicate that the Cipunagara River Basin (DAS) has high rainfall variability with the potential for extreme rainfall in large return periods. The peak discharge of the 100-year return period is 1003.582 m³/second, indicating the risk of extreme flooding because it exceeds the river capacity of 309.31 m³/second. The results of flood modeling show that the flood water level in the 100-year return period reaches +8,908 meters, which confirms the need for a minimum toll road infrastructure elevation of +9,908 meters to meet the vertical clearance standard. These findings provide a significant contribution to the planning of toll road infrastructure that is more resilient to flood risks, supports operational sustainability, and reduces potential economic losses.

References

binamarga.pu.id, “Mulai Digarap, Jalan Tol Akses Pelabuhan Patimban Akan Perlancar Arus Logistik,” 2024. .

PwC Indonesia, “PUPR starts to construct Patimban Access Toll Road Packages 1-3: Facilitating logistics flow,” 2023. .

detikjabar, “Sungai Cipunagara Subang Berstatus Siaga, Warga Diminta Waspada,” 2024. .

Liputan6, “Sepekan Banjir Subang, Ribuan Rumah di 4 Kecamatan Masih Terendam,” 2021. .

MetroTV, “Sungai Cipunagara Meluap, Warga Pamanukan Mengungsi,” 2022. .

R. Nogherotto et al., “A combined hydrological and hydraulic modelling approach for the flood hazard mapping of the Po river basin,” J. Flood Risk Manag., vol. 15, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12755.

A. Torabi Haghighi et al., “When rain does not run, a fingerprint of uncoordinated water resources development,” J. Hydrol., vol. 629, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130626.

C. K. Tran and D. A. Do, “Application of Integrated HydroHydraulic Model to Assess the Impact of Infrastructure on Flood Drainage Issue Case Study for The Downstream of Kone-Ha Thanh River Basin,” J. Water Environ. Technol., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 45–58, 2022, doi: 10.2965/jwet.21-139.

S. Pandwar and O. Singh, “Modelling Magnitude And Frequency Of Floods In The Upper Yamuna River Basin, India,” Punjab Geogr., vol. 17, pp. 1–30, 2021.

A. Anisha, A. Jacob, R. Davis, and S. Mangalathu, “Fragility functions for highway RC bridge under various flood scenarios,” Eng. Struct., vol. 260, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114244.

X. Ma and W. Zhang, “Updated dynamic amplification factors of existing short span bridge considering the debris effects,” in Earth and Space 2021: Materials, Structures, Dynamics, and Control in Extreme Environments - Selected Papers from the 17th Biennial International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments, 2021, pp. 414–424, doi: 10.1061/9780784483381.038.

R. K. Arora and S. Banerjee, “Flood vulnerability of inland bridges with foundation scour,” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 2024, doi: 10.1080/15732479.2024.2386080.

S. Thapa, H. D. Sinclair, M. J. Creed, A. G. L. Borthwick, C. S. Watson, and M. Muthusamy, “Sediment Transport and Flood Risk: Impact of Newly Constructed Embankments on River Morphology and Flood Dynamics in Kathmandu, Nepal,” Water Resour. Res., vol. 60, no. 10, 2024, doi: 10.1029/2024WR037742.

K. Sefat and R. Tsubaki, “Flood Risk Assessment of the Middle Reach of the Helmand River, Afghanistan,” J. Disaster Res., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 455–464, 2024, doi: 10.20965/jdr.2024.p0455.

N. Asselman, J. S. de Jong, D. Kroekenstoel, and S. Folkertsma, “The importance of peak attenuation for flood risk management, exemplified on the Meuse River, the Netherlands,” Water Secur., vol. 15, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.wasec.2022.100114.

D. Myronidis and E. Ivanova, “Generating Regional Models for Estimating the Peak Flows and Environmental Flows Magnitude for the Bulgarian-Greek Rhodope Mountain Range Torrential Watersheds,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.3390/w12030784.

A. Syaifurahman, D. A. Nurzain, and R. M. S. Prastica, “River engineering for flooding characteristics in the upperstream part of Bengawan Solo Sub-watershed,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, vol. 622, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/622/1/012001.

N. D. Sirait, C. Ikhsan, and R. Hadiani, “Sediment Transport of Bengawan Solo River (Case: Dengkeng-Pusur Segment),” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2022, vol. 2543, doi: 10.1063/5.0094972.

S. A. Nurhayati, M. Marselina, and A. Z. Fuad, “Analyzing the primary hydrological components (rainfall and discharge) within the context of Cipunagara Watershed management, West Java,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2023, vol. 1263, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1263/1/012034.

S. O. Oyegoke, A. S. Adebanjo, and H. J. Ododo, “Rainfall intensity analysis for synoptic stations in northern nigeria,” Niger. J. Technol. Dev., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 223–228, 2020, doi: 10.4314/njtd.v17i3.9.

D. N. Hussein, S. H. D. Al-Zakar, and A. M. Yonis, “Estimating the Intensity Equations for Rain Intensity Frequency Curves (Mosul/Iraq),” Tikrit J. Eng. Sci., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 38–48, 2023, doi: 10.25130/tjes.30.3.5.

B. Oh, J. Kim, and S. Hwang, “Influence of Rainfall Patterns on Rainfall–Runoff Processes: Indices for the Quantification of Temporal Distribution of Rainfall,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 20, 2024, doi: 10.3390/w16202904.

J. Griffiths, K. E. Borne, A. Semadeni-Davies, and C. C. Tanner, “Selection, Planning, and Modelling of Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 19, 2024, doi: 10.3390/w16192802.

S. A. Mitoulis, S. A. Argyroudis, M. Loli, and B. Imam, “Restoration models for quantifying flood resilience of bridges,” Eng. Struct., vol. 238, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112180.

S. F. Azha et al., “Assessing dam spillway discharge capacity in response to extreme floods in Perak river hydroelectric scheme: Simulation and proposed mitigation measures,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 14, no. 11, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2023.102540.

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2024-12-22

How to Cite

Noviantoro, A. A. D., Mulyawati, F., & Nurvita, R. S. (2024). Flood Risk Analysis for the Construction of the Patimban Port Access Toll Road. UKaRsT, 8(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.30737/ukarst.v8i2.6192

Issue

Section

Articles