Mapping Agricultural Research on Peatlands: A Bibliometric Analysis of Trends and Gaps (2004–2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30737/agrinika.v9i1.6452Keywords:
agricultural policy, bibliometric, crop diversification, peatland, sustainable agriculture, VOSviewerAbstract
Peatlands in Indonesia play a crucial role in global carbon storage and agricultural productivity. However, their use for agriculture has raised environmental concerns, particularly regarding land degradation, carbon emissions, and fire risks. This study employs a bibliometric approach using Publish or Perish (PoP) and VOSviewer to analyze research trends, dominant topics, and gaps in Indonesian peatland agriculture from 2004 to 2024. Three thousand nine hundred fifty (3,950) publications from Google Scholar were examined to identify thematic clusters and shifts in research focus. The results indicate a significant increase in research on peatland agriculture over the past two decades, with a primary focus on land management, environmental impact, and agricultural commodity adaptation. Oil palm remains the dominant research topic, while studies on alternative crops, horticulture, and sustainable peatland management strategies remain underexplored. Although fire mitigation has gained attention, long-term sustainability approaches and policy-driven land management strategies require further investigation. This study underscores the need for a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach to ensure sustainable peatland agriculture. Future research should prioritize the diversification of peat-adaptive crops, precision agriculture technologies, and ecosystem-based restoration methods. Additionally, policymakers must integrate research findings into comprehensive land-use planning to balance agricultural productivity with environmental conservation. Strengthening regulations, incentivizing sustainable practices, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration will be essential for addressing the challenges of peatland agriculture and ensuring its long-term viability.
References
Al Husaeni, D. F., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2021). Bibliometric Using VOSviewer with Publish or Perish (using Google Scholar data): From Step-by-step Processing for Users to the Practical Examples in the Analysis of Digital Learning Articles in Pre and Post Covid-19 Pandemic. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(1), 19–46.
Askary, M., & Astuti, H. P. (2022). Model pengelolaan lahan gambut berkelanjutan pada lanskap Kesatuan Hidrologis Gambut (KHG) SMPEI-GEF 5 sebagai upaya mendorong capaian SDGs di Indonesia. Direktorat Pengendalian Kerusakan Ekosistem Gambut.
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381–1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20609
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
Couwenberg, J., Dommain, R., & Joosten, H. (2010). Greenhouse gas fluxes from tropical peatlands in south-east Asia. Global Change Biology, 16(6), 1715–1732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02246.x
Dohong, A., Aziz, A. A., & Dargusch, P. (2018). A review of the drivers of tropical peatland degradation in South-East Asia. Land Use Policy, 69, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.035
Dommain, R., Couwenberg, J., & Joosten, H. (2014). Development and carbon sequestration of tropical peat domes in south-east Asia: Links to post-glacial sea-level changes and Holocene climate variability. Quaternary Science Reviews, 96, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.04.009
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
Evans, C. D., Page, S. E., Jones, T., & Moore, S. (2019). Peatland restoration: Challenges and opportunities. Global Change Biology, 25(11), 3551–3561. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14765
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56(3), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022378804087
Handayani, J. S. (2021). Analisis usahatani nanas di lahan gambut dan pemasarannya di Kelurahan Sungai Pakning Kecamatan Bukit Batu Kabupaten Bengkalis Provinsi Riau. Universitas Islam Riau.
Harrison, M. E., Ottay, J. B., D’Arcy, L. J., Cheyne, S. M., Anggodo, Belcher, C., & Cole, L. E. S. (2020). Tropical peatland restoration in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities. Restoration Ecology, 28(5), 1015–1021. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13245
Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342
Hooijer, A., Page, S., Canadell, J. G., Silvius, M., Kwadijk, J., Wösten, H., & Jauhiainen, J. (2012). Current and future CO2 emissions from drained peatlands in Southeast Asia. Biogeosciences, 9(3), 1053–1071. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1053-2012
Jaenicke, J., Rieley, J. O., Mott, C., Kimman, P., & Siegert, F. (2010). Determination of the amount of carbon stored in Indonesian peatlands. Geoderma, 147(3–4), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.08.008
Miettinen, J., Shi, C., & Liew, S. C. (2016). Land cover distribution in the peatlands of Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra and Borneo in 2015 with changes since 1990. Global Ecology and Conservation, 6, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2016.02.004
Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002
Page, S. E., Rieley, J. O., & Banks, C. J. (2011). Global and regional importance of the tropical peatland carbon pool. Global Change Biology, 17(2), 798–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02279.x
Purnomo, H., Okarda, B., Dermawan, A., Ilham, Q. P., Pacheco, P., Nurfatriani, F., & Suhendang, E. (2019). Reconciling oil palm economic development and environmental conservation in Indonesia: A value chain dynamic approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102089
Ritzema, H., Limin, S., Kusin, K., Jauhiainen, J., & Wösten, H. (2014). Canal blocking strategies for hydrological restoration of degraded tropical peatlands in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Catena, 114, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.009
Small, H. (2006). Tracking and predicting growth areas in science. Scientometrics, 68(3), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0132-y
Suhartawan, I. G., & Sulaiman, Z. P. (2024). Ke Mana Arah Penelitian Agribisnis Indonesia? Analisis Bibliometrik Periode 2004–2024. AGRINUS : Jurnal Agro Marin Nusantara, 1(2), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.62180/w9cqf630
Sumarga, E., Hein, L., Hooijer, A., & Vernimmen, R. (2016). Hydrological and economic effects of oil palm cultivation in Indonesian peatlands. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08490-210252
Uda, S. K., Hein, L., & Sumarga, E. (2017). Towards sustainable management of Indonesian tropical peatlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 25(6), 683–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-017-9544-0
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wahyunto, W., Ritung, S., & Subagjo, H. (2013). Distribution of peatland in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science, 14(1), 1–10.
Wösten, J. H. M., Clymans, E., Page, S. E., Rieley, J. O., & Limin, S. H. (2008). Peat–water interrelationships in a tropical peatland ecosystem in Southeast Asia. Catena, 73(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2007.09.005
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Permitted third-party reuse is defined by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND). This permission allows users to copy and distribute the Article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes and further does not permit distribution of the Article if it is changed or edited in any way, and provided the user gives appropriate credit (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI), provides a link to the license, and that the licensor is not represented as endorsing the use made of the work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
