Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Fuzzy TOPSIS pada Pemilihan Himpunan Pairing Terpilih dari Jadwal Penerbangan

Authors

  • Dinita Rahmalia Universitas Islam Darul Ulum Lamongan
  • Awawin Mustana Rohmah Universitas Islam Darul Ulum Lamongan
  • Nuril Lutvi Azizah Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30737/jatiunik.v4i1.922

Keywords:

Algoritma Greedy, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Decision-making, Fuzzy TOPSIS, Scheduling Problems

Abstract

In the flight industry, there are two highest costs such as fuel cost and crew cost. The crew cost is affected by pairings selected from flight schedule. This research will explain about selecting the set of selected pairings using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Fuzzy TOPSIS). Before using either Fuzzy AHP or Fuzzy TOPSIS, it will be formed collection of the set of selected pairings using greedy algorithm. After collection of the set of selected pairings is formed, then we determine goal and criteria. The goal is selecting the set of selected pairings from some alternatives. For each the set of selected pairings, there are some criterions such as the number of deadhead, the number of pairing A2, the number of pairing A3, the number of pairing A4, the number of pairing A5, and the number of pairing A6. Based on simulation results, both AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS can select and give the rank of priority in entire the set of selected pairings.

 

Pada industri maskapai penerbangan, terdapat dua biaya yang sangat besar yaitu biaya bahan bakar dan biaya kru. Biaya kru dipengaruhi oleh pairing yang terpilih dari jadwal penerbangan. Pada penelitian ini akan dilakukan pemilihan himpunan pairing terpilih menggunakan metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Fuzzy Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Fuzzy TOPSIS). Sebelum menggunakan AHP atau Fuzzy TOPSIS, akan dibentuk kumpulan dari himpunan pairing terpilih menggunakan greedy algorithm. Setelah kumpulan himpunan pairing terpilih terbentuk, maka dibentuk goal dan kriteria. Goal adalah memilih himpunan pairing terpilih dari beberapa alternative. Pada setiap himpunan pairing yang terpilih, terdapat beberapa kriteria seperti jumlah deadhead, jumlah pairing A2, jumlah pairing A3, jumlah pairing A4, jumlah pairing A5, dan jumlah pairing A6. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan, metode AHP dan Fuzzy TOPSIS dapat memilih dan memberi peringkat prioritas pada pemilihan himpunan pairing terpilih.

References

R. D. P. Wibisono, “PENGARUH KUALITAS PELAYANAN, FASILITAS DAN KEPERCAYAAN MEREK TERHADAP LOYALITAS KONSUMEN (Studi Kasus pada Rumah Sakit Pelni Petamburan – Jakarta),†UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH, 2016.

E. Acar et al., “Development of Stitched, Braided and Woven Composite Structures in the ACT Program and at Langley Research Center (1985 to 1997),†J. Aircr., 2011.

M. Rahardjo, “STUDI KASUS DALAM PENELITIAN KUALITATIF: KONSEP DAN PROSEDURNYA,†J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 2017.

A. Rahma Putri, “Perancangan Alat Penyiram Tanaman Otomatis pada Miniatur Greenhouse Berbasis IOT,†pp. 155–159, 2019.

C. Li, M. Negnevitsky, and X. Wang, “Prospective Assessment of Methanol Vehicles in China Using FANP-SWOT Analysis,†Transp. Policy, vol. 96, pp. 60–75, 2020.

S. Barak and S. Javanmard, “Outsourcing Modelling Using a Novel Interval-Valued Fuzzy Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) and Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDMs),†Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 222, p. 107494, 2020.

I. A. Risqiyah and I. Santoso, “RISIKO RANTAI PASOK AGROINDUSTRI SALAK MENGGUNAKAN FUZZY FMEA,†J. Manaj. dan Agribisnis, 2017.

R. A. Sari, R. Yuniarti, and F. R. N. Safitri, “Evaluasi Kinerja Perusahaan Berdasarkan Perspektif Organisasi, Proses, dan Staf Berbasis AHP dan OMAX,†J. Tek. Ind., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 49–57, 2018.

M. Yusuf, “STRATEGI PROSES TRANSISI DARI METODE SIX SIGMA KE DFSS ( DESIGN FOR SIX SIGMA ) MENGGUNAKAN APLIKASI AHP ( ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS ),†Tek. Ind., no. June 2017, 2018.

M. B. Bouraima, Y. Qiu, B. Yusupov, and C. M. Ndjegwes, “A Study on the Development Strategy of the Railway Transportation System in the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) Based on the SWOT/AHP Technique,†Sci. African, vol. 8, pp. 1–11, 2020.

H. Retnowati, A. Sukmawati, and T. W. Nurani, “Strategi Peningkatan Kinerja Nelayan dalam Rantai Pasok Ikan Layur melalui Pengembangan Modal Insani di Pelabuhanratu,†MANAJEMEN IKM: Jurnal Manajemen Pengembangan Industri Kecil Menengah, vol. 9, no. 2. pp. 140–149, 2014.

F. J. Cabrerizo, M. A. Martínez, M. Herrera, and E. Herrera-Viedma, “Consensus in a fuzzy environment: A bibliometric study,†Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 55, no. Itqm, pp. 660–667, 2015.

H. Hosseini Nasab and A. S. Milani, “An Improvement of Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Fuzzy Numbers,†Appl. Soft Comput. J., vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 2246–2253, 2012.

H. Hosseini Nasab and A. S. Milani, “An Improvement of Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Fuzzy Numbers,†Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 2246–2253, Aug. 2012.

M. Basjir, H. Supriyanto, and M. S. 3 Magister, “Pengembangan Model Penentuan Prioritas Perbaikan Terhadap Mode Kegagalan Komponen Dengan Metodologi FMEA, Fuzzy dan Topsis Yang Terintegrasi,†Magister Tek. Ind. - Jur. Tek. Ind., vol. Prosiding, 2011.

A. I. Nurani, A. T. Pramudyaningrum, S. R. Fadhila, S. Sangadji, and W. Hartono, “Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuzzy AHP, and TOPSIS for Determining Bridge Maintenance Priority Scale in Banjarsari, Surakarta,†Int. J. Sci. Appl. Sci. Conf. Ser., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 60, 2017.

E. T. Tosida, H. Thaheer, and S. Maryana, “Strategi Peningkatan Daya Saing Melalui Framework Rantai Nilai Untuk Kompetensi Usaha Jasa Telematika Indonesia,†J. Penelit. Pos dan Inform., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, 2017.

M. Tavassoli, R. F. Saen, and D. M. Zanjirani, “Assessing sustainability of suppliers: A novel stochastic-fuzzy DEA model,†Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 21, pp. 78–91, 2020.

P. K. Marhavilas, M. Filippidis, G. K. Koulinas, and D. E. Koulouriotis, “A HAZOP with MCDM based risk-assessment approach: Focusing on the deviations with economic/health/environmental impacts in a process industry,†Sustain., vol. 12, no. 3, 2020.

A. A. Longaray, J. De Deus Rodrigues Gois, and P. R. Da Silva Munhoz, “Proposal for using AHP method to evaluate the quality of services provided by outsourced companies,†Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 55, no. Itqm, pp. 715–724, 2015.

S. Kumar and A. Garnaik, “A Case Study in Chair by Applying Quality Function Deployment & Analytic Hierarchy Process,†no. 2006, pp. 1001–1007, 2016.

E. Nurmianto and A. H. Nasution, “PERUMUSAN STRATEGI KEMITRAAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE AHP DAN SWOT ( Studi Kasus pada Kemitraan PT . INKA dengan Industri Kecil Menengah di Wilayah Karesidenan Madiun ),†Fak. Ekon., vol. 1, pp. 47–60, 2018.

S. Supriyadi, K. Mawardi, and A. Nalhadi, “Minimasi Biaya Dalam Penentuan Rute Distribusi Produk Minuman Menggunakan Metode Savings Matrix,†Semin. Nas. Inst. Supply Chain dan Logistik Indones. Univ. Hasanuddin Makasar, no. September, pp. 1–8, 2017.

D. P. Alam Syah, “Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process: Sistem Rekomender Database Software,†J. Inform., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 59–73, 2014.

A. A. Mahmudi, B. Surarso, and A. Subagio, “Kombinasi Balanced Scorecard dan Objective Matrix Untuk Penilaian Kinerja Perguruan Tinggi,†J. Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2014.

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2020-10-30

How to Cite

Rahmalia, D., Rohmah, A. M., & Azizah, N. L. (2020). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Fuzzy TOPSIS pada Pemilihan Himpunan Pairing Terpilih dari Jadwal Penerbangan. JATI UNIK : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Dan Manajemen Industri, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30737/jatiunik.v4i1.922

Issue

Section

Articles