Analisis Biaya Dan Jadwal Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Trenggalek Dengan Metode Earned Value

Authors

  • Bagus Zakariyya Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Kadiri
  • Ahmad Ridwan Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Kadiri
  • Suwarno Suwarno Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Kadiri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30737/jurmateks.v3i2.1197

Keywords:

ACWP, BCWP, BCWS, Construction Project, Earned Value Method

Abstract

The construction of the Trenggalek District Health Office Building is a large-scale construction project. Large-scale projects often have performance issues. It is necessary to control costs and schedules for the project to go according to plan. Research using the Earned Value Method aims to find out the performance index, estimate the cost and time of completion of the work. They thus obtained corrections that must be made to the progress of the project. The results of the study in the 12th week were Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS) amounting to Rp1,946,626,471.64, Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP) amounted to Rp1,319,204,394.05, Actual Cost of Work Performed (ACWP) of Rp1,181,554,085.52. Performance costs benefit; Cost Varian (CV) of Rp137,660,308.53 or Cost Performance Index (CPI) is worth 1,117>1. Schedule performance is delayed, Schedule Varian (SV) of -Rp627,422,077.59 or Schedule Performance Index (SPI) is worth 0.678<1. Estimate at Completion (EAC) of Rp3,483,730,479.63 benefited Rp405,885,332.51. Estimate All Schedule (EAS) for 29,707 weeks, slow 5,707 weeks.

Pembangunan Gedung Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Trenggalek merupakan proyek konstruksi berskala besar.Pada proyek berskala besar sering terjadi permasalahan kinerja. Oleh karena itu perlu pengendalian biaya dan jadwal agar proyek berjalan sesuai rencana. Penelitian ini menggunakan Metode Earned Value dengan tujuan agar   dikeetahui indek kinerja, dan dapat memperkirakan biaya dan waktu penyelesaian pekerjaan, sehingga  diperoleh koreksi yang harus dilakukan untuk kemajuan proyek. Hasil penelitian pada minggu ke-12 adalah Budgeted Cost of Work Schedule (BCWS) sebesar Rp1.946.626.471,64, Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP) sebesar Rp1.319.204.394,05, Actual Cost of Work Performed (ACWP) sebesar Rp1.181.554.085,52. Kinerja biaya mendapat keuntungan, Cost Varian (CV) sebesar Rp137.660.308,53 atau Cost Performance Index (CPI) bernilai 1,117>1. Kinerja jadwal mengalami keterlambatan, Schedule Varian (SV) sebesar -Rp627.422.077,59 atau Schedule Performance Index (SPI) bernilai 0,678 < 1. Estimate at Completion (EAC) sebesar Rp3.483.730.479,63 mendapat keuntungan sebesar Rp405.885.332,51. Estimate All Schedule (EAS) selama 29,707 minggu, lambat 5,707 minggu.

References

X. Wang, P. E. D. Love, and P. R. Davis, “Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World,†Constr. Res. Congr., pp. 778–786, 2012.

D. K. Sudarsana, “Pengendalian Biaya Dan Jadual Terpadu Pada Proyek Konstruksi,†vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 117–125, 2008.

W. Kurniawan, D. Purnomo, and Astuti, “Analisis Earned Value Waktu dan Biaya Proyek Konstruksi Jalan,†J. Saintis, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 6–16, 2017.

J. Bin Yang, C. C. Yang, and C. K. Kao, “Evaluating schedule delay causes for private participating public construction works under the Build-Operate-Transfer model,†Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 569–579, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.10.005.

R. Ajiono and H. Wahyudiono, “Analisis Faktor Risiko Penawaran Di Bawah Estimasi Terhadap Kinerja Kualitas Proyek Konstruksi Bangunan di Kota Trenggalek Jawa Timur,†UKaRsT, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 164–173, 2018.

E. Gardjito, “Pengendalian Jadwal Dan Anggaran Terpadu Dengan Metode Earned Value Analysis Pada Pekerjaan Konstruksi,†UKaRsT, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 2017.

A. Ridwan and R. Ajiono, “PENGENDALIAN BIAYA DAN JADUAL TERPADU PADA PROYEK KONSTRUKSI,†UKaRsT, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 71–84, 2017.

M. Z. Hidayat and U. Marfuah, “PENERAPAN PROJECT CONTROL PROCESS DENGAN METODE EARNED VALUE MANAJEMEN PADA PROYEK PENGADAAN KELAMBU BERINSEKTISIDA ( Studi Kasus PT . Adiwara Worldwide ),†JISI J. Integr. Sist. Ind., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2017.

P. R. Budi, Witjaksana; Samuel, “Analisis Kinerja Proyek Dengan Metode Earned Value Dalam Proses Kinerja,†Extrapolasi J. Tek. Sipil Untag Surabaya, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 45–56, 2012.

W. I. Ervianto, “Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi,†Yoyakarta Andi Offset, 2005.

M. Y. Cheng, M. H. Tsai, and Z. W. Xiao, “Construction management process reengineering: Organizational human resource planning for multiple projects,†Autom. Constr., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 785–799, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2005.10.014.

Imam Soeharto, “Manajemen Proyek Dari Konseptual Sampai Operasional,†Jakarta: Erlangga, 1997.

E. W. Hans, W. Herroelen, R. Leus, and G. Wullink, “A hierarchical approach to multi-project planning under uncertainty,†Omega, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 563–577, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.10.004.

S. M. J. JR Meredith, SM Shafer, Project Management, A Managerial Approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Inc, 2017.

Q. W. Fleming and J. M. Koppelman, “The Essence and Evolution of Earned Value,†Cost Eng., vol. 36, no. 11, 1994.

K. Henderson, “Earned Schedule : A Breakthrough Extension to Earned Value Management EVM Measures and Indicators,†PMI Asia Pacific Glob. Congr. Proc., pp. 1–10, 2007.

I. Rahman, “Earned value analysis terhadap biaya pada proyek pembangunan gedung (Studi kasus proyek pembangunan gedung C fakultas MIPA UNS),†Digilib UNS, 2010.

R. Mokler, “Making decisions on enterpriseâ€wide strategic alignment in multinational alliances,†Manag. Decis., 2001.

I. Dipohusodo, “Manajemen Proyek dan Konstruksi. Jilid 1,†Kanisius, 1995.

H. Abrar, “Manajemen Proyek: Perencanaan Penjadwalan & Pengendalian Proyek,†Yoyakarta Andi Offset, 2010.

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2020-10-30

Issue

Section

Articles