Alternatif Perencanaan Oprit Jembatan Batanghari (STA 15+750) di Jalan Tol Ruas Jambi – Rengat

Authors

  • Fikri Irfanil Azami Departemen Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Sipil Perencanaan dan Kebumian, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya.
  • Yudhi Lastiasih Departemen Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Sipil Perencanaan dan Kebumian, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30737/jurmateks.v7i2.6288

Keywords:

Approach Embankment, Lightweight Material, Mortar Foam, Variation

Abstract

Batanghari Bridge is part of the Jambi-Rengat Toll Road, faces significant challenges due its clay as the topsoil and dominant stratigraphy of sand. These contdition lead to high settlement potential and stability issues under heavy loads, requiring innovative to enhance stability and control costs. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a combination of mortar foam and ordinary soil on at the Batanghari Bridge (STA 15+750). Observations were made at 2 abutments. Embankment material variation include 100% ordinary soil, 100% mortar foam, and combinations of 25%, 50%, and 75%. Results reveal that land subsidence from embankment loads and mortar foam remains high, necessitating alternative treatments. The findings indicate that for Abutment 1 benefits from Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) and geotextile reinforcement, combined with 75% ordinary soil and 25% mortar foam. This approach reduces load and enhances stability at a cost of Rp29,045,321,602. Conversely, Abutment 2, with a 3-meter soft soil depth, achieves optimal results using 100% ordinary fill soil with replacement and geotextile reinforcement, costing Rp22,403,576,498. It was found that the differences in effective methods at Abutment 1 and Abutment 2 were caused by variations in subgrade conditions and soft soil depth at both locations. The study highlights the importance of tailoring embankment material and soil improvement methods to specific subgrade conditions. By demonstrating the effectiveness of combining material variations with soil improvement techniques, the findings contribute significantly to geotechnical engineering, offering practical, cost-efficient strategies for similar infrastructure projects    

References

[1] Badan Pusat Statistik, “Statistik Indonesia 2024,” 2024. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/02/28/c1bacde03256343b2bf769b0/statistik-indonesia-2024.html

[2] M. Siswoyo, “The Impact of Toll Road Development: An Analysis Based on Public Administration Ecology,” J. Southwest Jiaotong Univ., vol. 55, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.35741/issn.0258-2724.55.3.53.

[3] P. M. Wicaksana, E. Buchari, and M. Agustien, “The Impact of Trans Sumatera Toll Road Development on The National Road in Palembang City,” Cantilever J. Penelit. dan Kaji. Bid. Tek. Sipil, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2022, doi: 10.35139/cantilever.v11i1.137.

[4] Hutama Karya (Persero), “Laporan Rencana Teknik Akhir Jalan Tol Ruas Jambi – Rengat Seksi 1,” Jakarta, 2024.

[5] S. Bartlett, D. Arellano, J. Vaslestad, R. Aabøe, and T. Ahmed, “Bridge foundations supported by EPS geofoam embankments on soft soil,” 10th Int. Conf. Geosynth. ICG 2014, pp. 281–294, 2014.

[6] S. Chaiyaput, J. Ayawanna, P. Jongpradist, H. Poorahong, R. Sukkarak, and P. Jamsawang, “Application of a cement–clay–air foam mixture as a lightweight embankment material for construction on soft clay,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 18, no. May, p. e02188, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02188.

[7] A. Febriansya, A. K. Somantri, Iskandar, L. Z. Mase, and R. Raafidiani, “Experimental Study of an Embankment Over a Soft Soil Layer Using Clay-Fly Ash-Eps Mixtures As a Lightweight Fill Material,” Int. J. GEOMATE, vol. 23, no. 98, pp. 39–46, 2022, doi: 10.21660/2022.98.3415.

[8] P. P. Rahardjo, B. W. Anggoro, M. Wijaya, and D. P. Seourin, “EPS-Geofoam as Lightweight material for Replacement of Embankment Fill to Overcome Landslide Problems at STA 40+200 of Cisumdawu Toll Road, West Java,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Env. Sci, vol. 1249, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1249/1/012001.

[9] D. R. Akbari, “Analisa Kestabilan Lereng Timbunan Terhadap Variasi Material dan Tinggi Timbunan, Durasi Hujan dan Sensitivitas pada Ruas Jalan P.Molang - Bululawang STA 0+950 - 1+250,” Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, 2022.

[10] M. A. Putra Adi, Y. Lastiasih, and I. B. Mochtar, “Alternatif Perencanaan Timbunan Jalan dengan Material Sirtu dan Material Ringan Mortar Busa pada Jalan Tol Batang – Semarang Seksi III Weleri – Kendal STA 414+525 – STA 424+576,” J. Transp. Sist. Mater. dan Infrastruktur, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 72, 2019, doi: 10.12962/j26226847.v1i2.5029.

[11] S. Kraus et al., “Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice,” Rev. Manag. Sci., vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 2577–2595, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8.

[12] K. PUPR, “Spesifikasi Umum Untuk Pekerjaan Konstruksi Jalan dan Jembatan Revisi 1,” Edaran Dirjen Bina Marga Nomor 02/SE/Db/2018, no. September, pp. 1–199, 2018.

[13] Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat, “Surat Edaran Kementerian PUPR tentang Pedoman Perencanaan Teknis Timbunan Material Ringan Mortar Busa untuk Konstruksi Jalan,” Indonesia, 2015.

[14] SNI 8460:2017, “Persyaratan Perancangan Geoteknik,” Standar Nas. Indones., vol. 8460, pp. 1–323, 2017.

[15] Badan Standarisasi Nasional, “SNI 1726:2019 :Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan NongedungTata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Nongedung,” no. 8, 2019.

[16] A. S. Saada, G. Fries, and C. C. Ker, “An Evaluation of Laboratory Testing Techniques in Soil Mechanics,” Soils Found., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 98–112, 1983, doi: 10.3208/sandf1972.23.2_98.

[17] F. Tatsuoka and et.al, “Standard Penetration Tests and Soil Liquefaction Potential Evaluation,” Soils Found., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 95–111, 1980, doi: 10.3208/sandf1972.20.4_95.

[18] C. Kang et al., “Examination of the correlation between SPT and undrained shear strength: Case study of clay till in Alberta, Canada,” Eng. Geol., vol. 334, p. 107510, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107510.

[19] R. Rochmawati, P. H. Sitorus, and I. Irianto, “Slope stability analysis using GEO5 in Gurabesi Village Papua Province based on limit equilibrium method,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 3145, no. 1, p. 20060, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1063/5.0214559.

[20] A. Maulana, N. E. Mochtar, and P. T. Kumalasari, “Alternatif Perencanaan Timbunan dan Perbaikan Tanah Dasar pada Jalan Tol Krian-Legundi-Bunder-Manyar (STA 12+434 s/d STA 12+684),” J. Tek. ITS, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 2–9, 2020, doi: 10.12962/j23373539.v8i2.45914.

[21] Tim Dosen Rumpun Mata Kuliah Geoteknik Departemen Teknik Sipil, Modul Ajar Timbunan Dan Konstruksi Penahan Tanah. Surabaya, 2023.

[22] H. Wahyudi, Y. Lastiasih, T. R. Satrya, M. Arif, and P. T. K. Sari, “the Comparison of the Soft Clay Settlement Under an Embankment Load Using Field Instrumentation and Empirical Formulation,” Int. J. GEOMATE, vol. 21, no. 84, pp. 93–102, 2021, doi: 10.21660/2021.84.j2151.

[23] Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat, “Manual Desain Perkerasan Jalan,” no. 02, 2017, [Online]. Available: inamarga.pu.go.id/index.php/nspk/detail/02mbm2017-manual-desain-perkerasan-jalan

[24] M. M. Abdel-Rahman, “Review of Soil Improvement Techniques BT - Advancements in Geotechnical Engineering,” H. Shehata and M. Badr, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 175–199.

[25] R. H. Risdianta, “Perencanaan Perbaikan Tanah Lunak Menggunakan Preloading Dengan Kombinasi Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) dan Prefabricated Horizontal Drain (PHD) pada Pembangunan Kawasan Kota Summarecon Bandung Area Amanda dan Btari,” Universitas Brawijaya Malang, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://repository.ub.ac.id/9623/

[26] M. Batara and N. Gofar, “Pengaruh Penggantian Tanah Dan Lapisan Geotekstil Terhadap Deformasi Dan Stabilitas Lereng Timbunan Di Atas Tanah Lunak,” JMTS J. Mitra Tek. Sipil, no. Aug., pp. 915–924, 2024, doi: 10.24912/jmts.v7i3.29080.

[27] M. Fitriansyah, D. P. Hardiani, and I. Setiawan, “Analisis Kohesi Dan Sudut Gesek Antara Tanah Gambut-Geotekstil (Studi Tanah Gambut Di Kabupaten Banjar),” Konstruksia, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 41, 2020, doi: 10.24853/jk.11.1.41-50.

[28] R. Simbolon and H. Sutanto, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Geotextile Terhadap Nilai Faktor Keamanan Lereng Pada Konstruksi Dinding Penahan Tanah Kantilever,” vol. 8, pp. 27–36, 2024.

[29] N. Zahera, M. Widiastuti, and T. S. P. Arifin, “Analisis Kekuatan Struktur Minipile Pasca Keruntuhan Dengan Menggunakan Software Plaxis V8.6,” Tek. Sipil Univ. Mulawarman Samarinda, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Alternatif Perencanaan Oprit Jembatan Batanghari (STA 15+750) di Jalan Tol Ruas Jambi – Rengat. (2025). Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi & Teknik Sipil, 7(2), 98-113. https://doi.org/10.30737/jurmateks.v7i2.6288

Similar Articles

11-20 of 65

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.