Analisa Risiko Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja Menggunakan Standar AS/NZS 4360:2004 Di Perusahaan Pulp&Paper

Authors

  • Muhamad Bob Anthony Program Studi Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Serang Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30737/jatiunik.v2i2.332

Keywords:

HIRA (Hazard Identification And Risk Assessment), AS/NZS 4360, 2004, Basic Risk Existing Risk

Abstract

This research has the purpose to find out the value of the risk of the potential dangers of work and level of risk of the potential dangers of working and know the potential dangers of dominant work that led to the occurrence of accidents at the company's pulp paper process in & area the production of paper. This research approach by using the method of HIRA (Hazard Identification and Risk just my Assesment) using the standard AS/NZS4360:2004 to calculate values before there is risk control (basic risk) until after control of risk (existing risk). The results of the activities of the production process on the company PT. XYZ is acquired 16 basic risk activity that consists of a category acceptable risk as 6, priority 3 category 2 category, substantial risk (priority 2) as many as 3 risk, priority 1 category 4 category of risk and very high risk as much as 1. After control of the risk (the existing risk) obtained a decrease risk category can be received (acceptable) a total of 10 risk (62.5%), priority 3 as much as 5 risk (31.25%) and substantial category (priority 2) as much as 1 risk (6.25%) While the priority categories 1 and very high risk categories have been lost after a controlling or mitigating risk

 

Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk mengetahui nilai risiko potensi bahaya kerja dan level risiko potensi bahaya kerja serta mengetahui potensi bahaya kerja dominan yang menyebabkan terjadinya kecelakaan kerja di perusahaan pulp&paper pada proses di area produksi kertas. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan dengan metode HIRA (Hazard Identification and Risk Assesment) dengan menggunakan standar AS/NZS4360:2004 untuk menghitung nilai-nilai risiko sebelum ada pengendalian (basic risk) sampai setelah dilakukan pengendalian terhadap risiko (existing risk). Hasil penelitian dari kegiatan proses produksi pada perusahaan PT. XYZ ini didapatkan 16 kegiatan basic risk  yang terdiri dari kategori acceptable sebanyak 6 risiko, kategori priority 3 sebanyak 2 risiko, kategori substantial (priority 2) sebanyak 3 risiko, kategori priority 1 sebanyak 4 risiko dan kategori very high sebanyak 1 risiko. Setelah dilakukan pengendalian terhadap risiko (existing risk) didapatkan penurunan resiko yaitu kategori dapat di terima (acceptable) sebanyak 10 risiko (62,5%), priority 3 sebanyak 5 risiko (31,25%) dan kategori substantial (priority 2) sebanyak 1 risiko (6,25%) sedangkan kategori priority 1 dan kategori very high risk  telah hilang setelah dilakukan pengendalian atau mitigasi resiko.

 

 

References

L. Jacxsens, M. Uyttendaele, and B. De Meulenaer, “Challenges in Risk Assessment: Quantitative Risk Assessment,†Procedia Food Sci., vol. 6, no. Icsusl 2015, pp. 23–30, 2016.

E. Jamilah, Y. H. Yadi, and A. Umyati, “Identifikasi Potensi Bahaya Dengan Metode Hazard And Operability Study ( HAZOP ) Di Area Boiler PT . XYZ,†J. Tek. Ind. Univ. Ageng Tirtayas, 2013.

Psychologymania, “Pengertian Kesehatan Kerja,†www.psychologymania.com, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.psychologymania.com/2012/09/pengertian-kesehatan-kerja.html. [Accessed: 29-Nov-2019].

N. H. Hamidah, P. Deoranto, and R. Astuti, “ANALISIS PRODUKTIVITAS MENGGUNAKAN METODE OBJECTIVE MATRIX (OMAX): STUDI KASUS PADA BAGIAN PRODUKSI SARI ROTI PT NIPPON INDOSARI CORPINDO, TBK PASURUAN Productivity Analysis Using Objective Matrix (OMAX) Method: Case Study On The Production Departement Of,†J. Teknol. Pertan. Anal. Produkt., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 215–222, 2013.

Prodiaohi, “Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja,†prodiaohi.co.id, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://prodiaohi.co.id/kesehatan-dan-keselamatan-kerja. [Accessed: 29-Nov-2019].

D. Misdarpon and M. Fatori, “Keselamatan Kerja dan Kesehatan Lingkungan,†Direktorat Jendral Manaj. Pendidik. Dasar dan Menengah Kementrian Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 1, pp. 1–107, 2013.

S. Rahayuningsih and J. A. Pradana, “Identifikasi Penerapan Dan Pemahaman Kesehatan Dan Keselamatan Kerja Dengan Metode Hazard And Operability Study (Hazop) Pada UMKM Eka Jaya,†JATI UNIK J. Ilm. Tek. dan Manaj. Ind., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 20, 2019.

D. Retnowati, “Analisa Risiko K3 Dengan Pendekatan Hazard and Operability Study (Hazop),†Tek. Eng. Sains J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2017.

S. O. D. Ningsih and S. W. Hati, “Analisis Resiko Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Dengan Menggunakan Metode Hazard And Operability Study (HAZOP) Pada Bagian Hydrotest Manual Di PT. Cladtek Bi Metal Manufacturing,†J. Appl. Bus. Adm., vol. 3 No.1, pp. 29–39, 2019.

P. K. Markkanen, Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja di Indonesia. Jakarta : Internasional Labour Organisation Sub Regional South-East Asia and The Pacific Manila Philippines, 2004.

M. Soyster, B. T. Ristau, E. D. Girard, Y. Liang, P. Hegde, and B. A. Harnisch, “An unlikely connection: Rare case of colo-urachal fistula, surgical management, and review of the literature,†Urol. Case Reports, vol. 18, pp. 9–10, 2018.

Sugiyono, “Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods),†Bandung Alf., 2010.

H. Hasanah, “TEKNIK-TEKNIK OBSERVASI (Sebuah Alternatif Metode Pengumpulan Data Kualitatif Ilmu-ilmu Sosial),†At-Taqaddum, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 21, 2017.

A. Y. Ambarani and A. R. Tualeka, “Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (Hira) Pada Proses Fabrikasi Plate Tanki 42-T-501a Pt Pertamina (Persero) Ru Vi Balongan,†Indones. J. Occup. Saf. Heal., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 192, 2017.

A. 4360:2004, “Perbandingan Standar Manajemen Risiko Australia / New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 4360:2004 dengan COSO Enterprise Risk Management 2004.†Standar Manajemen Risiko Australia/ New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 4360:2004, Australia, pp. 1–5, 2004.

AustralianStandard, “Australian Standard / New Zaeland Standard Risk Management 4360:2004.†Sydney and Wellington, New Zealand, p. 1, 2004.

D. Macdonald, Practical Hazops, Trips and Alarms, 1st ed. Newnes, 2004.

Vishwas H SG D Gidwani, “Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment in Metro Railway Line Construction Project at Hyderabad,†Int. J. Eng. Res., vol. V6, no. 08, pp. 243–249, 2017.

P. Pradhan, “A HIRARC MODEL FOR SAFETY AND RISK AT I nternational J ournal of E ngineering R esearches and M anagement S tudies,†IJERMS, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 23–34, 2016.

H. Luthfi,Achmad dan Irawan, “Analisis Risiko Rantai Pasok Dengan Model House Of Risk (HOR),†Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia. 2012.

Nurlela and H. Suprapto, “Identifikasi dan Analisis Manajemen Risiko Pada Proyek Pembangunan Infrastruktur Bangunan Gedung Bertingkat,†J. Ilm. Desain dan Konstr., 2014.

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2019-04-29

How to Cite

Anthony, M. B. (2019). Analisa Risiko Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja Menggunakan Standar AS/NZS 4360:2004 Di Perusahaan Pulp&Paper. JATI UNIK : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Dan Manajemen Industri, 2(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.30737/jatiunik.v2i2.332

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): April

Section

Articles

License

Information regarding Copyright and Licensing at JATI UNIK as follows:

  1. Licensed Use of Non - Commercial Articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license, which is featured on the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share A Like 4.0 International License.
  2. The author guarantees that the articles published through JATI UNIK are original and do not contain statements that violate the law do not violate others' rights are subject to copyright, which is held exclusively by the author and free from the rights of third parties. The author is allowed to quote from various sources used for research and not to harm any party.
  3. JATI UNIK disseminates articles published with the rules set by Creative Commons. UNIK JATI license allows users to copy, distribute, display, and work for non-commercial purposes. Users also need to connect authors and JATI UNIK with the distribution of articles in journals.
  4. The Author rights, namely copyrights, ownership rights, patents, rights to use the substance of articles in the future, rights to reproduce articles for personal purposes and not to be traded, rights to conduct personal archives, rights to contract used for the non-exclusive distribution of articles published in the form a book and acknowledge the initial publication of the article originating from JATI UNIK.
  5. Suppose articles published by the author through JATI UNIK are compiled with other authors. In that case, it is necessary to create a form containing the authority of all authors involved in the article's production by including the agreement agreed upon by all authors in the article.
  6. The next point is, the agreement can be terminated if the author or JATI UNIK violates the agreement and cannot make repairs to the customer within a maximum of 2 months after being given information asking for the violation to be corrected. If there is no violation of the agreement, the license will automatically terminate and affect UNIQUE JATI UNIK.
  7. Regarding royalties, so far, if it is following applicable legal regulations, the author will waive his right to collect royalties on articles that have been licensed by JATI UNIK.
  8. In publishing the article, the editorial process is successful. JATI UNIK will continue it. JATI UNIK has the right to adjust articles related to punctuation, spelling, capital letters, references used, and usage adapted to JATI UNIK. The author acknowledges that the article can be published and accessed free of charge by the public.