Evaluasi Struktur Bangunan Eksisting Menggunakan Fmea-Fishbone Diagram Untuk Keperluan Pemeriksaan Kelaikan Fungsi Bangunan

(Studi Kasus: Gedung Toko, Jl. Persada, Desa/Kelurahan Kerobokan Kelod, Kec. Kuta Utara, Kab.Badung, Bali)

Authors

  • I Kadek Yoga Dwi Mahendra Universitas Udayana
  • I Gede Adi Susila Universitas Udayana
  • Ida Ayu Made Budiwati Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30737/jatiunik.v9i2.7091

Keywords:

accident risk assessment, ETABS, FMEA, nonlinear pushover analysis, structural performance

Abstract

This study examines the integration of structural performance analysis and occupational accident risk assessment in a multi-storey building project using a quantitative approach based on nonlinear pushover analysis and FMEA. Structural evaluation is commonly conducted separately from safety risk analysis, resulting in non-integrated technical decision-making and risk control. This study aims to identify the seismic performance of the structure and determine accident risk priorities based on the Risk Priority Number (RPN). Nonlinear pushover analysis was performed using ETABS to obtain drift and base shear values; risk evaluation applied FMEA (Severity, Occurrence, Detection); and root causes were analyzed using a Fishbone Diagram. The maximum drift reached 216.317 mm with a base shear of 45,737.96 kN (Infilled Frame, Y-direction) and 206.337 mm with 10,199.32 kN (Open Frame, Y-direction). The highest risk occurred in foundation work with an RPN of 174,857.14. Strengthening lower-storey stiffness and implementing performance-based high-priority risk control are required. This research proposes an integrated evaluation model linking structural response and construction safety risk management quantitatively and systematically.

References

[1] K. P. U. dan P. Rakyat, “Peraturan Menteri PUPR Nomor 27/PRT/M/2018 tentang Sertifikat Laik Fungsi Gedung,” Jakarta, 2018.

[2] I. Hidayat, A. F. S. Rahardhani, and G. A. Suhardjo, “Utilizing hammer tests and ultrasonic pulse velocity to ascertain the compressive strength of concrete,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1324, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012006.

[3] Meylinda Sabrinawati and I Nyoman Dita Pahang Putra, “Analysis of the Risk of Work Accidents in High-Story Building Construction Projects using the FMEA (Failure Modes and Effects Analysis) Method,” Formosa J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1391–1406, 2024, doi: 10.55927/fjmr.v3i5.9520.

[4] A. Reza, I. Vanany, and Machsus, “Risk assessment for apartment building maintenance using Fuzzy-FMEA methods,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1072, no. 1, p. 012001, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1072/1/012001.

[5] M. Dlimi, R. Agounoun, I. Kadiri, R. Saadani, and M. Rahmoune, “Thermal performance assessment of double hollow brick walls filled with hemp concrete insulation material through computational fluid dynamics analysis and dynamic thermal simulations,” e-Prime - Adv. Electr. Eng. Electron. Energy, vol. 3, no. November 2022, p. 100124, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.prime.2023.100124.

[6] S. F. Lahmadi, B. Ridhosari, I. W. K. Suryawan, and A. Sarwono, “Risk Assessment in 13-Story Building Projects With the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (Fmea) Method and the Domino Effect,” J. Kesehat. Masy. Dan Lingkung. Hidup, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 83–95, 2021, doi: 10.51544/jkmlh.v6i2.2206.

[7] N. Kokkaew and A. Rakprasong, “Modelling an Extension Decision of BOT Transportation Infrastructure: A Risk-Adjusted Approach,” in ICCREM 2020: Intelligent Construction and Sustainable Buildings - Proceedings of the International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management 2020, W. Y., O. T., and S. G.Q.P., Eds., Center of Excellence in Infrastructure Management, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Chulalongkorn Univ., Bangkok, Thailand: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2020, pp. 435–444. doi: 10.1061/9780784483237.052.

[8] J. Liu, P. E. D. Love, P. R. Davis, J. Smith, and M. Regan, “Conceptual framework for the performance measurement of public-private partnerships,” J. Infrastruct. Syst., vol. 21, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000210.

[9] I. K. Smout and S. D. Gorantiwar, “Productivity and equity of different irrigation schedules under limited water supply,” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. - ASCE, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 349–358, 2006, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:4(349).

[10] A. S. of C. Engineers, ASCE/SEI 41-17: Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. Reston, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017.

[11] L. J. Goodwin Robbins, K. M. Rodgers, B. Walsh, R. Ain, and R. E. Dodson, “Pruning chemicals from the green building landscape,” J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 236–246, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41370-019-0174-x.

[12] N. Rasheed, W. Shahzad, M. Khalfan, and J. O. B. Rotimi, “Risk Identification, Assessment, and Allocation in PPP Projects: A Systematic Review,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 8, 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12081109.

[13] M. I. Martadinata et al., “RISK-BASED MAINTENANCE DENGAN METODE FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS ( FMEA ) UNTUK PENINGKATAN KEANDALAN SISTEM PENDINGIN UDARA DI GEDUNG KOMERSIL RISK-BASED MAINTENANCE WITH FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS ( FMEA ) METHOD TO IMPROVE THE RELIABILITY OF AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS IN COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS PENDAHULUAN Sistem Pemanasan , Ventilasi , dan Pendingin Udara ( Heating , Ventilation , and Air Conditioning - HVAC ) memegang peranan vital dalam operasional gedung institusional dan komersial modern . Fungsi utamanya tidak hanya terbatas pada penciptaan kenyamanan termal bagi penghuni , tetapi juga esensial untuk menjaga produktivitas , melindungi peralatan elektronik yang sensitif , dan memastikan kelancaran proses operasional secara keseluruhan . Gangguan atau kegagalan pada sistem ini dapat mengakibatkan kerugian signifikan , mulai dari biaya perbaikan yang tidak terduga hingga hilangnya pendapatan akibat terhentinya kegiatan operasional . Seiring dengan perkembangan ilmu manajemen aset , filosofi pemeliharaan telah berevolusi secara signifikan ( Yusuf , 2016 ). Pendekatan awal yang bersifat reaktif atau korektif , di mana perbaikan hanya dilakukan setelah terjadi kerusakan , terbukti tidak efisien dan berbiaya tinggi . Hal ini mendorong pengembangan strategi pemeliharaan terencana berbasis waktu ( time-based maintenance ), di mana komponen diganti atau diservis berdasarkan jadwal tetap ( Ali M & Kusuma , 2019 ). Meskipun lebih baik daripada pendekatan reaktif , strategi ini juga memiliki kelemahan , seperti penggantian komponen yang masih berfungsi baik atau , sebaliknya , kegagalan komponen sebelum jadwal pemeliharaan tiba . Untuk mengatasi inefisiensi ini , pendekatan modern seperti Reliability-Centered Maintenance dan Risk-Based Maintenance ( RBM ) dikembangkan oleh Moubray di tahun 1997 . RBM secara spesifik memfokuskan sumber daya pemeliharaan pada aset atau komponen yang memiliki risiko kegagalan tertinggi , yang diukur dari kombinasi probabilitas kegagalan dan dampak konsekuensinya ( Leoni dkk ., 2021 ). Konteks penelitian ini adalah Gedung Serba Guna ( GSG ) di Politeknik Penerbangan Palembang , dimana sebagai institusi yang beroperasi dengan Pola Pengelolaan Keuangan Badan Layanan Umum ( PK- BLU ), GSG bukan hanya fasilitas pendukung akademik , tetapi juga merupakan aset strategis yang dikelola untuk menghasilkan pendapatan . Dengan frekuensi penggunaan yang tinggi , terutama untuk acara seremonial seperti pernikahan dan rapat korporat …,” vol. 8, pp. 1750–1758, 2025.

[14] D. Lee, H. Lim, D. Lee, H. Cho, and K. I. Kang, “Assessment of Delay Factors for Structural Frameworks in Free-form Tall Buildings Using the FMEA,” Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater., vol. 13, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40069-018-0309-9.

[15] B. F. Supervised, “Designing A 4- Story Commercial Building usiang ETABS,” no. May, 2009.

[16] K. Naga Sai Gopal and N. Lingeshwaran, “Analysis and design of G+5 residential building by using E-Tabs,” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2098–2103, 2017.

[17] N. S. G. MURUGESAN, “Risk Assessment in Construction Using FMEA to Improve Quality: A Multi-Level Analysis,” Iarjset, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 356–368, 2025, doi: 10.17148/iarjset.2025.12847.

[18] B. S. Nasional, “SNI 1727:2020 Beban Desain Minimum dan Kriteria Terkait untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur Lain,” Jakarta, 2020.

[19] T. Tumingan, S. Alwi, and F. I. H, “Kapasitas Nilai Kuat Tekan Beton Dengan Hammer Test Dan Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (Upv) Jembatan Loa Haur,” Sebatik, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 582–592, 2022, doi: 10.46984/sebatik.v26i2.2026.

[20] S. Husein and M. Darwis, “Implementasi Software ETABS( Extended Three Dimensional Analysis of Building System) Untuk Struktur Gedung Kos 3 Lantai Kab.Gowa,” J. Bangunan Konstr., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 104–109, 2024, doi: 10.63877/jbk.v2i2.98.

[21] R. M. Wagner, H. Taroepratjeka, and F. H. Mustofa, “Usulan Peningkatan Kualitas Produk E-House Menggunakan Metode Failure Mode and Error Analysisi (FMEA) di PT X,” Reka Integr., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 24–36, 2015.

[22] A. Zuniawan, “A Systematic Literature Review of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Implementation in Industries,” IJIEM - Indones. J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 59, 2020, doi: 10.22441/ijiem.v1i2.9862.

[23] A. F. Bin Basri, A. F. A. Ghani, M. S. F. Hussin, A. R. Bin Saleman, and A. Faishal, “Pareto Analysis and Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) of Central Melaka Power Distribution Plant Maintenance Strategies,” J. Power Energy Eng., vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 87–110, 2025, doi: 10.4236/jpee.2025.1310007.

[24] A. International, ASTM C805/C805M-18: Standard Test Method for Rebound Number of Hardened Concrete. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2018.

[25] C. V. N. P. Desain, “Perencanaan Arsitektur dan Struktur Toko Lantai 4,” Badung, Bali, 2022.

[26] F. E. M. Agency, “FEMA 310: Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings—A Prestandard,” Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 1998.

[27] B. S. Nasional, “SNI 1726:2019 Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Nongedung,” Jakarta, 2019.

[28] B. S. Nasional, “SNI 2847:2019 Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Penjelasan,” Jakarta, 2019.

[29] B. S. Nasional, “SNI 6889:2022 Tata Cara Penilaian Kelaikan Fungsi Bangunan Gedung,” Jakarta, 2022.

[30] A. Nielsen, “Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) used on moistrue problems,” Indoor Air, p. p.38-43, 2002, [Online]. Available: http://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB7293.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-02-18

Issue

Section

Articles

Deprecated: json_decode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($json) of type string is deprecated in /home/ojs.unik-kediri.ac.id/public_html/plugins/generic/citations/CitationsPlugin.php on line 68

How to Cite

Evaluasi Struktur Bangunan Eksisting Menggunakan Fmea-Fishbone Diagram Untuk Keperluan Pemeriksaan Kelaikan Fungsi Bangunan: (Studi Kasus: Gedung Toko, Jl. Persada, Desa/Kelurahan Kerobokan Kelod, Kec. Kuta Utara, Kab.Badung, Bali). (2026). JATI UNIK : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Dan Manajemen Industri, 9(2), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.30737/jatiunik.v9i2.7091

Similar Articles

21-30 of 69

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.