KEPEMIMPINAN MORAL DALAM PERPEKTIF THE MODEL FOR INTERPERSONAL TEACHER BEHAVIOR

Hafis Muaddab; Khudrotun Nafisah

doi:10.30737/mediasosian.v7i1.4460

Authors

Hafis Muaddab Pasca Sarjana Pendidikan Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Malang
Khudrotun Nafisah Program Studi Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Darul Ulum

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30737/mediasosian.v7i1.4460

Keywords:

kepemimpinan moral, identitas moral, reformasi kurikulum, relasi antar pribadi

Abstract

Ungkapan nilai dasar dan etika manajemen merupakan acuan yang dapat mempengaruhi perilaku manusia dalam situasi tertentu. Ketika nilai-nilai inti digabungkan dengan kepemimpinan, itu berarti nilai-nilai referensi di bawah perilaku pemimpin dalam pelaksanaan kepemimpinan dalam perspektif sosiologis, model perilaku seorang guru hubungan interpersonal. Penelitian ini merupakan studi kepustakaan yang bertujuan untuk mengumpulkan informasi pustaka melalui catatan, berbagai buku, majalah dan penelitian sebelumnya. Seorang pemimpin yang efektif adalah orang yang merespon dengan baik semua masalah, kebutuhan, harapan dan impian orang-orang yang dipimpinnya. Dalam akhlak kepemimpinan sekolah, tindakan seorang pemimpin yang dianggap baik dan benar mencerminkan akhlakul karimahi dan dari segi sosial merupakan kegiatan yang beradab. Seorang pemimpin yang bermoral harus memiliki akhlak yang baik (akhlakul karimah) dan perbuatannya merupakan perbuatan yang beradab yang pada umumnya dianggap baik dan benar oleh masyarakat.

References

Aquino, K., & Freeman, D. (2009). Moral identity in business situations: A social-cognitive framework for understanding moral functioning. In D. Narvaez & D. K. Lapsley (Eds.) Moral personality, identity, and character: 375-395. Cambridge University Press.

Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A. II, Lim, V. K. G., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social cognitive model of moral behavior: The interaction of situational factors and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97: 123-141.

Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83: 1423-1440.

Aquino, K., Reed, A., Thau, S., & Freeman, D. (2007). A grotesque and dark beauty: How moral identity and mechanisms of moral disengagement influence cognitive and emotional reactions to war. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43: 385-392.

Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: theory, research and critique, (revised edn). Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Begley, P. (1999). Guiding values for future school leaders. Orbit, 30, (1), 19-23.

Bogotch, I., & Miron, L. (1998). Moral leadership: Discourses in Urban School Settings. Urban Education, 33, (3), 303-328.

Cheung, K. W. & Pan, S. (2006) Transition of moral eduacation in China: Towards Regulated Individualism. Citizenship Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 37-47. Rtetrieved from http://www.citized.info

Durkheim, E. (1961). Moral education: A Study in the Theory and Application of the Sociology of Education. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

Fenigstein, A. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43: 522-527

Fullan, M. (Ed.). (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press

Jerome Kagan. (1997) Temperament and the Reactions to Unfamiliarity Child Development, Vol. 68, No. 1 (Feb., 1997), pp. 139-143 Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Society for Research in Child Development Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1131931

K. Lapsley & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development, self, and identity: 189-212. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Klaassen, C. (2012). Just a teacher or also a moral example?. In D. Alt & R. Reingold (Eds.), Changes in teachers' moral role: From passive observers to moral and democratic leaders. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.

Lapsley, D. K., & Lasky, B. (2001). Prototypic moral character. Identity, 1: 345-363.

Lapsley, D. K., & Narvaez, D. (2004). A social-cognitive approach to the moral personality. In D.

Lumpkin, A. (2008). Teachers as role models teaching character and moral virtues. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 79(2), 45-50. doi: 10.1080/07303084.2008.10598134

Macdonald, D. (2003). Curriculum change and the post-modern world: Is the school curriculum-reform movement an anachronism?. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(2), 139-149. doi:10.1080/00220270210157605

Qoyyimah, U. (2015). EFL teachers professional dilemmas with moral curriculum reform in Indonesia (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/83676/

Rand,A. (1961). For The New Intellectual, New York: A Signet Book.

Rand,A. (1964). Virtue of Selfishness. New York: A Signet Book.

Rand,A. (1982). Philosophy: Who Need it, New York: A Signet Book.

Rand,A.(1964, Maret). Playboy Interview: Ayn Rand – Candid Conversation With The Fountainhead Of “Objectivism”. Playboy, 35 – 60.

Reed, A., & Aquino, K. F. 2003. Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 1270-1286.

Reed, A., Aquino, K., & Levy, E. 2007. Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71: 178-193.

Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. 2007. The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1610-1624.

Sergiovanni, T. (1992). Moral Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.

Weissbourd, R., Jones, S., Anderson, T. R., Kahn, J., & Russell, M. (2014). The children we mean to raise: The real messages adults are sending about values. In R. Weissbourd (Ed.), Cambridge, MA: The President and Fellows of Harvard College.

Yates, L., & Grumet, M. (Eds.). (2011). Curriculum in today's world: Configuring knowledge, identities, work and politics. New York: Taylor & Francis.