Unveiling Subsurface Characteristics of Cliff Land in Sibang, Bali Through Geoelectric Investigation

Authors

  • Nur Ayu Diana Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Janabadra University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Ganeca Efa Mareta Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30737/ukarst.v8i1.5557

Keywords:

Cliff Soil, Geoelectrical, Geological Risk Management, Geology Subsurface

Abstract

The unique geological formations and environmental dynamics of cliffs underscore the significance of comprehending soil composition and structural integrity for diverse applications, such as infrastructure development and environmental conservation. Geoelectrical needs to be done because the underground geological conditions of the cliff must be researched and assessed first before construction is carried out so that construction failure does not occur. This research aims to reveal the subsurface characteristics of cliff soil in Sibang, Bali through geoelectrical investigation. This research was conducted by evaluating the soil condition in the field using the geoelectric resistivity method to the ability of a material to inhibit the flow of electric current and geological regional theories. At points BL-01 and BL-04, there is a significant potential risk of landslides due to the thick layer of breccia, especially during high rainfall or additional loads in the area. Point BL-02 also has a potential risk of landslides due to the thick layer of basalt and wet sand. Meanwhile, points BL-03 and BL-05 are more ideal locations for construction because they consist of relatively stable hard rock. Point BL-06 outside the development zone has layers of gravel, weathered tuffa and andesite which could be considered for future development. Thus, a deep understanding of the geological characteristics of each point is important to manage risks and ensure the safety and sustainability of construction projects in that area.

References

K. Karimah, A. Susilo, E. A. Suryo, A. Rofiq, and M. F. R. Hasan, “Analysis of Potential Landslide Areas Using Geoelectric Methods of Resistivity in The Kastoba Lake, Bawean Island, Indonesia,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 660–665, 2022, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1414.

O. T. Ojo, I. J. Chiaka, and A. I. Mark, “Geophysical Subsurface Mapping Using the Electrical Resistivity Technique: A Comprehensive Study of the Petroleum Training Institute Main Campus in Effurun,” Indones. J. Earth Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, p. A846, 2024, doi: 10.52562/injoes.2024.846.

H. Mustafa, A. Maulana, U. R. Irfan, and A. Tonggiroh, “The Geoelectric approach to Analyzing the Profile of Post-Mining Nickel Laterite Deposits in the Motui District, North Konawe Regency, Indonesia,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1134, no. 1, p. 012035, 2023, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1134/1/012035.

U. Nuramadani, H. Halauddin, S. Suhendra, D. I. Fadli, A. P. Panjaitan, and J. E. E. Sinaga, “Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Microzonation using Microtremor Measurements Along Mountain Road in North Bengkulu–Lebong, Bengkulu Province,” J. Geocelebes, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 130–137, 2023, doi: 10.20956/geocelebes.v7i2.25476.

Basuki, N. Sulistiawati, D. Verdian, and Z. Naely, “The Sensitivity Level of Landslide Risk Using Geographic Information System on the Slopes of Mount Argopura, East Java, Indonesia,” J. Degrad. Min. Lands Manag., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 4949–4959, 2023, doi: 10.15243/jdmlm.2023.111.4949.

A. S. Akingboye and I. B. Osazuwa, “Subsurface geological, hydrogeophysical and engineering characterisation of Etioro-Akoko, southwestern Nigeria, using electrical resistivity tomography,” NRIAG J. Astron. Geophys., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 43–57, 2021, doi: 10.1080/20909977.2020.1868659.

A. Ferhat et al., “A Geoelectric Approach for Karst Groundwater Analysis,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 998, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/998/1/012012.

B. G. M. Saka, R. O. Tarru, E. Lolang, and A. Pakiding, “Identification of Slip Area in Makale Selatan District Using the Geoelectric Method,” J. Geocelebes, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 77–88, 2023, doi: 10.20956/geocelebes.v7i1.23654.

S. J. Ikard, K. C. Carroll, D. F. Rucker, R. F. Adams, and S. C. Brooks, “Geoelectric Characterization of Hyporheic Exchange Flow in the Bedrock-Lined Streambed of East Fork Poplar Creek, Oak Ridge, Tennessee,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 50, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.1029/2022GL102616.

S. O. Elkhateeb, W. Dosoky, A. Mohamed, and M. A. Abbas, “Geoelectric and Mineralogical Studies for Foundation Soil Characterization in New Luxor City, Upper Egypt,” Arab. J. Geosci., vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12517-022-10450-6.

J. Malone-Leigh, J. Campanyà, P. T. Gallagher, M. Neukirch, C. Hogg, and J. Hodgson, “Nowcasting Geoelectric Fields in Ireland Using Magnetotelluric Transfer Functions,” J. Sp. Weather Sp. Clim., vol. 13, no. 46, 2023, doi: 10.1051/swsc/2023004.

S. G. Field and W. Java, “Landslide Susceptibility Analysis in Kabandungan District and Salak Geothermal Field, West Java,” J. Geogr. Lingkung. Trop., vol. 4, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.7454/jglitrop.v4i2.75.

S. Feranie and A. Et., “Recent developments in the use of geoelectric resistivity for landslide surveys: an overview,” Gravity, vol. 9, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.30870/gravity.v9i2.19876.

I. . M. et all, “Quantitative interpretation of geoelectric inverted data with a robust probabilistic approach,” vol. 88, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.1190/GEO2022-0133.1.

D. H. Hasibuan and A. F. Ismaili, “Bumi Berdasarkan Data Standard PentrationTest ( SPT ) Studi Kasus Proyek Bandara Baru Yogyakarta International Airport,” vol. 06, no. 150, pp. 1–9, 2019.

A. Syafnur, H. Jibran, and W. D. Tonapa, “Investigation of Groundwater Aquifer Using Electrical Resistivity Method Wenner-Schlumberger Array Mattoangin Village, Bantimurung District, Maros Regency,” J. Geocelebes, vol. 2, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.20956/geocelebes.v7i1.23302.

M. et all, “Geoelectrical Model of Geothermal Spring in Ie Jue Seulawah Deriving From 2D Vlf-Em and Dc Resistivity Methods,” pp. 59–69, 2023, doi: 10.5937/jaes0-38014.

N. A. D. C. Dewi and R. P. Jaya, “Analisis Potensi Likuifaksi Pada Project Pembangunan Gudang Peti Kemas Tanjung Perak,” Univ. Janabadra Yogyakarta, vol. 312, pp. 978–623, 2021.

S. J. Ikard et al., “Geoelectric Monitoring of the Electric Potential Field of the Lower Rio Grande before, during, and after Intermittent Streamflow, May–October, 2022,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 9, 2023, doi: 10.3390/w15091652.

A. Cardil, S. Monedero, G. Schag, and M. Tapia, “Jo u rn a ro of,” J. Alloys Compd., p. 165187, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100033.

S. Huang, Y. Lyu, G. Wu, H. Sha, and Y. Peng, “Seismic resistance performance of a utility tunnel in saline soil foundation based on new cementitious composite materials,” Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1590/1679-78255854.

D. Singh and V. Kumar, “Slope Stability Analysis of Highway Embankment by Using GEO5 Software,” Lect. Notes Civ. Eng., vol. 280, no. September, pp. 249–257, 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-4739-1_24.

V. L. et All, “Analysis of the Geoelectric Field in Sweden Over Solar Cycles 23 and 24: Spatial and Temporal Variability During Strong GIC Events,” Sp. Weather, vol. 21, 2023, doi: 10.1029/2023SW003588.

G. O. Adesola, O. Gwavava, K. Liu, and S. Szalai, “Hydrological Evaluation of the Groundwater Potential in the Fractured Karoo Aquifer Using Magnetic and Electrical Resistivity Methods: Case Study of the Balfour Formation, Alice, South Africa,” Int. J. Geophys., vol. 2023, 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/1891759.

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Diana, N. A., & Mareta, G. E. (2024). Unveiling Subsurface Characteristics of Cliff Land in Sibang, Bali Through Geoelectric Investigation. UKaRsT, 8(1), 67 –. https://doi.org/10.30737/ukarst.v8i1.5557

Issue

Section

Articles